It's hard for me to break off from the NYT after 60 years, even though I do not trust much of anything it says on foreign relations, the environment, or US health policies. It has reduced itself to the level of the National Enquirer. I continue to subscribe, perhaps to see how low it can go - but it seems to be bottomless. I would miss the book reviews, cooking, obits, and a few issues others don't cover -their reporting on Guantanamo Bay has been good. But I am warming up to ending my long-term affair with them as it's now an embarrassment that I subscribe.
My wife was injected with the Salk vaccine contaminated with SV40! Lost her early due to Lymphoma. Had to contribute to her early passing! The deranged medicine men don’t want RFK to fix the bloated sick care system that rewards them so richly. Senator Durbin is their champion and says RFK is not qualified! Pfizer bribed Trump with a million dollar donation to get a Lilly lawyer appointed to run HHS for managing the Covid con.
New York Times is on par with Canada’s CBC - maybe a bit worse. Here in Canada there’s a small class of non-thinkers that still tune in to CBC. Canadians find them weak and disgusting! There must be similarities with NYT in America?
And how about canceling that law about liability for vaccines by Big Pharma? No one else gets a pass for harming others! How about outlawing lobbyists all together?
Americans have a constitutional right to petition their government. These Americans include lobbyists. What we need to do is to make it unlawful for Congress people to participate in the stock market. Any stocks they currently have must be placed in blind trusts. And we need to figure out a way to prevent their family members from benefiting from this insider stock trading. How can we prevent them from passing on insider stock information?
term limits would help. It probably takes a while to "tune in" to things before they have the balls feed info to their families.
IRS random checks of all congressional members would be another.
Corporate lobbyists should be outlawed. If you are paid by ANY corporation or organization supported by a consortium of corporations of like motivation, it should be un lawful.
Can there ever be “far too little” aluminum injected into our children? No aluminum is good, especially since these vaccines are often injected 2,3,4,5 at a time. I get that they use this to boot/up an immune response, but our children are getting more than 70 of these injections. How about a test on the cumulative effects?
It's not quite so simple. The pharmaceutical companies simply threatened to stop producing vaccines because of the liability. They got a federal panel to compensate any potential victims and cut the plaintiff’s lawyers out.
Later this same drug companies developed new products, labeled them as vaccines, and skipped out of the liability for the newer products.
The government wrote the rules. The pharmas are taking advantage of existing laws
We can move it all to China and get the Wuhan flu in exchange as bappen d four years ago.
" threatened to stop producing vaccines because of the liability."
how could we be so lucky!
an idea: New law: unlawful for (name the "worst" vax jab) in all states beginning with M for 10 years. After 5 years evaluate the statistical difference in mortality from that disease / syndrome comparing other states with the "M's" using 3 separate and independent agencies selected by RFK Jr and Steve Kirsch. Let the cards fall where they may: If the M's are better off, Cancel that vax and follow same procedure against the NEXT worst vax, rinse and repeat.
too many vaccines, OK, but then you say you want some, it appears?
So, I'm confused.
Anyway, my proposal, simplifying, is to take the WORST vaccine with the MOST negative consequences for humans, and STOP using it.
UUuuh, that would mean start with the mRNA vax, next probably Gardasil. . . etc.
Anyway, the idea is not to impose the "experiment" on the ENTIRE population. Start with states with first letter M, or say 10 counties in the whole US, randomly picked or picked at the request of the people, themselves.
The idea is to start winnowing out the bad vaccines, first.
Great interview, John! The fact that people still read the NYT is beyond my comprehension, but I guess brainwashing has become the norm in our country. So sad...
For the past fifty years it appears as if most of the sincere political activists have attempted to educate the population about certain egregious matters in the hopes that the properly enlightened citizen will either support a particular candidate for public office, purchase educational materials to enlighten others, or accomplish something that will prevent the destruction of our sacred posterity.
This line of hopeful reasoning has failed, and it must be abandoned because it does not work.
The study of human nature and psychology demonstrates that every person has a story and situation that exceeds everyone else’s. And every person considers themselves to be just, honorable and virtuous.
And this aspect of human nature must be leveraged towards the common good.
Fortunately, the technology is available to do this.
By using the technology, we declare ourselves sovereign.
The time to use the technology is now.
It is a known fact that the members of the US Congress and the State Legislatures do not read, evaluate, or debate any of the particulars of the Legislation they vote on. They cannot read or debate the issues because the Bills approach 2000 pages each. And there are one hundred new bills / acts of Congress for them to vote on every day they are in session. They vote the way the party bosses tell them to vote. The news media may comment on one or two pieces of Congressional business per month, and the commentary will be adding to the confusion.
During the 1992 Presidential campaign, Ross Perot called attention to this insanity with a diplomatic observation that "a general lack of accountability among elected officials and those in the bureaucracy was the one specific reason that the people in America suffered".
Mr. Perot then suggested that the best and perhaps only way to make government officials accountable was to include the citizens in the decision-making process - every hour, every day.
He went on to note that this can easily be done with computers and called the proposed mechanism
THE ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL.
With this computer program every interested citizen can indicate whether or not they agree, disagree, or are undecided with every line item of every law, policy and program on the books or that was being advanced. It can be used at every level of government and in every jurisdiction.
To prevent chaos the basic law, our Constitution and Bill of Rights would be exempt from review.
Mr. Perot speculated that the Founding Fathers would probably have done the same had the technology been available. He referred to it as the Fourth Branch of government; The Citizens Branch / The Electronic Townhall.
If the government is truly of the people, by the people and for the people then what better way is there to perfect every section of the various laws and policies that do affect each and every one of us every single day?
It would not be difficult to expect at least 50 thousand qualified citizens, per congressional district, to evaluate 20 pages of law or proposed law, per day, and get their Ratify, Annual, or Undecided input every day the congress is in session. The results could be aggregated, made known and we would all be better off.
The program would even allow a citizen to go back and change their vote as they matured. And when a super majority is reached the law/proposed law is either ratified or annulled by immediate recognition of the enforcement mechanisms.
With tens of millions of laws and tens of thousands of taxes there is plenty of work to be done.
According to Mr. Perot, this, the harnessed experience and the combined intelligence of hundreds of thousands or even millions of citizens focused like a laser light on the real issues, will, as surely as night follows the day, perfect every law in our country and eventually it will right every wrong.
Mr. Perot publicly announced his intention to give the fourth branch of government to the people in America if he was elected President.
But this attempt to empower our humanity was so far removed from the business-as-usual-two-party-system that the talking heads and trolls yelled out that Mr. Perot was trying to destroy our Constitution, our government and our way of life.
The ELECTONIC TOWNHALL was denounced as unworkable.
How would the poor participate?
How would fraud be prevented?
What about those who do not know how to use a computer?
In a final act of desperation, the control freaks claimed that letting the average citizen to pass judgment on the individual pieces of public law would lead to chaos and pandemonium.
The media was so intensely negative towards the ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL that Mr. Perot was forced to stop talking about it, but he never withdrew it from his platform.
But we all know the truth: only the concerned will bother to participate.
It’s now been thirty-two years since the proposal.
No other person of national reputation or significant influence has picked up the idea. BUT the big two political parties regularly stage "townhall meetings" where they talk of "reform" and "returning power to the people". They do this to link themselves to the empowering part of the idea without adding to its manifestation.
And still we suffer in the hopeless loop of: "candidates with a sense of morality and respect for the Constitution who understand true brotherhood, justice and democracy and who will do the right thing for us each and every time, trust me".
While we cannot make light of sincere individuals who get into public office, we must acknowledge the fact that regardless of who has been elected to public office the problems in our government get more complicated and our people continue to suffer.
Could we possibly admit that our national situation, now being made global, is far too complicated for the President and the 535 elected members of the legislature to manage in our best interests?
You, the person reading this know some of the things we need.
Your friends, our fellow countrymen have their solutions too.
The only way to organize the workable ideas is to create a device that will enable all of us to simultaneously contribute our best thinking and most benevolent experience towards solving our most complicated problems.
That device is THE ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL and the place to begin is with our existing laws.
According to Ross Perot, this is the only way forward.
Recently, Elon Musk announced that his artificial intelligence program will run on X Premium, and it will provide the text to the laws the Congress is voting on. Everyone should get on board and ask Mr. Musk to include the business of the State Legislatures too – with the Ratify, Annual or Undecided feature to built right in. But why stop there? The county commissioners vote on hundreds of billions of dollars of activity every week…. And the local school board needs help too.
# A1. Should the US Congress establish Law that would subordinate their activity to the ratification or annulment of a super majority of the “qualified” voters in their district?
a. Yes
b. No
c. Undecided
# 1. Who gets to vote in the: general election?
a. citizens only - Yes No
b. natural born citizens only - Yes No
c. natural born citizens with four natural born grandparents - Yes No
d. naturalized citizens (legal immigrants) - Yes No
e. legal immigrants not yet naturalized - Yes No
f. anyone with a drivers license – Yes - No
# 2. Ages of Voter
g. minimum18 years
h. minimum 21 years
i. minimum 25 years
j. minimum 30 years
k. minimum 33 years
l. minimum 35 years
# 3. Sex of Voter
a. Male – Yes - No
b. Female – Yes - No
c. Non – Binanry - Yes - No
d. Transgender - Yes - No
# 4. Competence of Voter
e. property owners net value over $50,000 - Yes - No
f. property owners net value over $250,000 - Yes - No
g. tax exempt persons – Yes - No
h. those receiving welfare / food stamps – Yes - No
i. those with unpaid child support obligations - Yes - No
j. those receiving WIC – Yes - No
k. those receiving Section 8 – Yes - No
l. those working for government bureaucracies – Yes - No
m. those that will pay a $5000 poll tax - Yes - No
n. those that have paid a minimum of $5000 per year of tax for their combined jurisdictions in excess of any received via SS, Medicare, Medicaid, ATFWDC - Yes - No
# 5. Genetic presence of Voter
a. Male without children – Yes - No
b. Male with children – Yes - No
c. Male with children plural vote – Yes - No
d. Female without children – Yes - No
e. Female with children – Yes - No
f. Female with children plural vote – Yes - No
g. Only married males with children, never divorced can vote. – Yes - No
# 6. Who should be trusted with the responsibility and power of public
office?
a. Only those authorized to vote in the general election - Yes No
b. Male without children – Yes - No
c. Male with children – Yes - No
d. Female without children – Yes - No
e. Female with children – Yes - No
f. Only married males with children, never divorced can hold public office – Yes - No
g. Depends on the office - Yes - No
h. minimum18 years - Yes - No
i. minimum 21 years - Yes - No
j. minimum 25 years - Yes - No
k. minimum 30 years - Yes - No
l. minimum 33 years - Yes - No
m. minimum 35 years - Yes - No
#7. How long should a legally arrived, non-working, never worked in America, elderly
immigrant have to wait before they start collecting social security?
a. Six months
b. One year
c. Two years
d. Five years
e. never
#6. Presently the pharmaceutical companies that make “vaccines” are immune from liability.
QUESTION: should the makers of “vaccines” be immune from product safety liability?
YES Pero was a breathe of fresh air tho the "sleeping giant" was still slumbering away far from Awakened, tho slowly incrementally more so Esp over the last 14yrs starting with the TEA PARTY PATRIOTS;
tho the Globalist owned Atheist MarXist's among us didn't take us serious, now WE are getting seriously organized...!
Aaron Siri is the most plausible and coherent speaker on this subject that I have heard. I am very thankful that he is in the position he is in, and not surprised at all that the judge in the Pfizer Papers trial found in favor of this brilliant lawyer. Obviously, Pfizer could not afford to have an honest lawyer...considering their liabilities if they revealed the truth about virtually anything they do. If I need a lawyer, where my life depended upon, I would ask for Aaron Siri. Thank you John Leake for this excellent interview. P.s. Three of my sisters were sterilized and one was paralyzed partially by the polio vaccine. All modern vaccines are harmful weapons it seems.
Anyone with a brain and a soul does not read the NYTIMES. They have become the shill for Big Pharma.
It's hard for me to break off from the NYT after 60 years, even though I do not trust much of anything it says on foreign relations, the environment, or US health policies. It has reduced itself to the level of the National Enquirer. I continue to subscribe, perhaps to see how low it can go - but it seems to be bottomless. I would miss the book reviews, cooking, obits, and a few issues others don't cover -their reporting on Guantanamo Bay has been good. But I am warming up to ending my long-term affair with them as it's now an embarrassment that I subscribe.
They are putting the MRNA vax in your food you need to
do this right now....... https://t.co/KXjORB2xR3
Yes, decades ago!
Sounds to me as if they always have been…
1,000%
My wife was injected with the Salk vaccine contaminated with SV40! Lost her early due to Lymphoma. Had to contribute to her early passing! The deranged medicine men don’t want RFK to fix the bloated sick care system that rewards them so richly. Senator Durbin is their champion and says RFK is not qualified! Pfizer bribed Trump with a million dollar donation to get a Lilly lawyer appointed to run HHS for managing the Covid con.
It seems like it all boils down to who gets paid.
There is a lower purpose in their commitment to a 'Cull of the Surplus Population' as the end result of the 'Sick Care System' making Physicians,
Pharmacists into their Marketing/Sales Division for higher profit from
investment into Chronic Illness leading to the cull.
New York Times is on par with Canada’s CBC - maybe a bit worse. Here in Canada there’s a small class of non-thinkers that still tune in to CBC. Canadians find them weak and disgusting! There must be similarities with NYT in America?
As a fellow Canadian I agree. CBC has become little more than the paid propaganda arm of the Liberal party.
You think CBC, getting a $1.4 BILLION a year subsidy from the neo-Marxist Ken Doll Fidel Jr run government might have something to do with it?
The New York Times has turned into a HEAPING PILE OF SHIT!
They represent the PROBLEM in this country.
EVERYONE CANCEL THEIR SUBSCRIPTION IMMEDIATELY!
I canceled after over 50 years because if their fake story about the BROOKLYN bar owner who died from covid
And how about canceling that law about liability for vaccines by Big Pharma? No one else gets a pass for harming others! How about outlawing lobbyists all together?
Americans have a constitutional right to petition their government. These Americans include lobbyists. What we need to do is to make it unlawful for Congress people to participate in the stock market. Any stocks they currently have must be placed in blind trusts. And we need to figure out a way to prevent their family members from benefiting from this insider stock trading. How can we prevent them from passing on insider stock information?
term limits would help. It probably takes a while to "tune in" to things before they have the balls feed info to their families.
IRS random checks of all congressional members would be another.
Corporate lobbyists should be outlawed. If you are paid by ANY corporation or organization supported by a consortium of corporations of like motivation, it should be un lawful.
Is this the same NYT that boasted a Pulitzer for reporting that Stalin was a “great-leader”?
That NYT?
Correction...the New York Slimes...
Thank you for exposing the fraud that infests the degenerate NYT.
Also, please check out and share the powerful video on this same subject from Thursdays "The Highwire" show here:
• https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/attorney-details-ny-times-misinfo-on-ican-polio-petition/
degenerate... yes, that's the word
Can there ever be “far too little” aluminum injected into our children? No aluminum is good, especially since these vaccines are often injected 2,3,4,5 at a time. I get that they use this to boot/up an immune response, but our children are getting more than 70 of these injections. How about a test on the cumulative effects?
It's not quite so simple. The pharmaceutical companies simply threatened to stop producing vaccines because of the liability. They got a federal panel to compensate any potential victims and cut the plaintiff’s lawyers out.
Later this same drug companies developed new products, labeled them as vaccines, and skipped out of the liability for the newer products.
The government wrote the rules. The pharmas are taking advantage of existing laws
We can move it all to China and get the Wuhan flu in exchange as bappen d four years ago.
" threatened to stop producing vaccines because of the liability."
how could we be so lucky!
an idea: New law: unlawful for (name the "worst" vax jab) in all states beginning with M for 10 years. After 5 years evaluate the statistical difference in mortality from that disease / syndrome comparing other states with the "M's" using 3 separate and independent agencies selected by RFK Jr and Steve Kirsch. Let the cards fall where they may: If the M's are better off, Cancel that vax and follow same procedure against the NEXT worst vax, rinse and repeat.
Stop. You have no idea what you are writing. There are too many “ vaccines .”
Most are not needed.
I know people who still have wounds from polio and walk with crutches. A colleague is deaf in one ear from rubella, I guy sterile from mumps.
These are real diseases.
Your comment self contradicts:
too many vaccines, OK, but then you say you want some, it appears?
So, I'm confused.
Anyway, my proposal, simplifying, is to take the WORST vaccine with the MOST negative consequences for humans, and STOP using it.
UUuuh, that would mean start with the mRNA vax, next probably Gardasil. . . etc.
Anyway, the idea is not to impose the "experiment" on the ENTIRE population. Start with states with first letter M, or say 10 counties in the whole US, randomly picked or picked at the request of the people, themselves.
The idea is to start winnowing out the bad vaccines, first.
What exactly did you think I meant?
Thank you for having Aaron on to explain what’s really going on
Thank you for clarifying this matter. I had heard a bit about the real story, but your article was most thorough.
Great interview, John! The fact that people still read the NYT is beyond my comprehension, but I guess brainwashing has become the norm in our country. So sad...
They are putting the MRNA vax in your food you need to
do this right now....... https://t.co/KXjORB2xR3
For the past fifty years it appears as if most of the sincere political activists have attempted to educate the population about certain egregious matters in the hopes that the properly enlightened citizen will either support a particular candidate for public office, purchase educational materials to enlighten others, or accomplish something that will prevent the destruction of our sacred posterity.
This line of hopeful reasoning has failed, and it must be abandoned because it does not work.
The study of human nature and psychology demonstrates that every person has a story and situation that exceeds everyone else’s. And every person considers themselves to be just, honorable and virtuous.
And this aspect of human nature must be leveraged towards the common good.
Fortunately, the technology is available to do this.
By using the technology, we declare ourselves sovereign.
The time to use the technology is now.
It is a known fact that the members of the US Congress and the State Legislatures do not read, evaluate, or debate any of the particulars of the Legislation they vote on. They cannot read or debate the issues because the Bills approach 2000 pages each. And there are one hundred new bills / acts of Congress for them to vote on every day they are in session. They vote the way the party bosses tell them to vote. The news media may comment on one or two pieces of Congressional business per month, and the commentary will be adding to the confusion.
During the 1992 Presidential campaign, Ross Perot called attention to this insanity with a diplomatic observation that "a general lack of accountability among elected officials and those in the bureaucracy was the one specific reason that the people in America suffered".
Mr. Perot then suggested that the best and perhaps only way to make government officials accountable was to include the citizens in the decision-making process - every hour, every day.
He went on to note that this can easily be done with computers and called the proposed mechanism
THE ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL.
With this computer program every interested citizen can indicate whether or not they agree, disagree, or are undecided with every line item of every law, policy and program on the books or that was being advanced. It can be used at every level of government and in every jurisdiction.
To prevent chaos the basic law, our Constitution and Bill of Rights would be exempt from review.
Mr. Perot speculated that the Founding Fathers would probably have done the same had the technology been available. He referred to it as the Fourth Branch of government; The Citizens Branch / The Electronic Townhall.
If the government is truly of the people, by the people and for the people then what better way is there to perfect every section of the various laws and policies that do affect each and every one of us every single day?
It would not be difficult to expect at least 50 thousand qualified citizens, per congressional district, to evaluate 20 pages of law or proposed law, per day, and get their Ratify, Annual, or Undecided input every day the congress is in session. The results could be aggregated, made known and we would all be better off.
The program would even allow a citizen to go back and change their vote as they matured. And when a super majority is reached the law/proposed law is either ratified or annulled by immediate recognition of the enforcement mechanisms.
With tens of millions of laws and tens of thousands of taxes there is plenty of work to be done.
According to Mr. Perot, this, the harnessed experience and the combined intelligence of hundreds of thousands or even millions of citizens focused like a laser light on the real issues, will, as surely as night follows the day, perfect every law in our country and eventually it will right every wrong.
Mr. Perot publicly announced his intention to give the fourth branch of government to the people in America if he was elected President.
But this attempt to empower our humanity was so far removed from the business-as-usual-two-party-system that the talking heads and trolls yelled out that Mr. Perot was trying to destroy our Constitution, our government and our way of life.
The ELECTONIC TOWNHALL was denounced as unworkable.
How would the poor participate?
How would fraud be prevented?
What about those who do not know how to use a computer?
In a final act of desperation, the control freaks claimed that letting the average citizen to pass judgment on the individual pieces of public law would lead to chaos and pandemonium.
The media was so intensely negative towards the ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL that Mr. Perot was forced to stop talking about it, but he never withdrew it from his platform.
But we all know the truth: only the concerned will bother to participate.
It’s now been thirty-two years since the proposal.
No other person of national reputation or significant influence has picked up the idea. BUT the big two political parties regularly stage "townhall meetings" where they talk of "reform" and "returning power to the people". They do this to link themselves to the empowering part of the idea without adding to its manifestation.
And still we suffer in the hopeless loop of: "candidates with a sense of morality and respect for the Constitution who understand true brotherhood, justice and democracy and who will do the right thing for us each and every time, trust me".
While we cannot make light of sincere individuals who get into public office, we must acknowledge the fact that regardless of who has been elected to public office the problems in our government get more complicated and our people continue to suffer.
Could we possibly admit that our national situation, now being made global, is far too complicated for the President and the 535 elected members of the legislature to manage in our best interests?
You, the person reading this know some of the things we need.
Your friends, our fellow countrymen have their solutions too.
The only way to organize the workable ideas is to create a device that will enable all of us to simultaneously contribute our best thinking and most benevolent experience towards solving our most complicated problems.
That device is THE ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL and the place to begin is with our existing laws.
According to Ross Perot, this is the only way forward.
Recently, Elon Musk announced that his artificial intelligence program will run on X Premium, and it will provide the text to the laws the Congress is voting on. Everyone should get on board and ask Mr. Musk to include the business of the State Legislatures too – with the Ratify, Annual or Undecided feature to built right in. But why stop there? The county commissioners vote on hundreds of billions of dollars of activity every week…. And the local school board needs help too.
# A1. Should the US Congress establish Law that would subordinate their activity to the ratification or annulment of a super majority of the “qualified” voters in their district?
a. Yes
b. No
c. Undecided
# 1. Who gets to vote in the: general election?
a. citizens only - Yes No
b. natural born citizens only - Yes No
c. natural born citizens with four natural born grandparents - Yes No
d. naturalized citizens (legal immigrants) - Yes No
e. legal immigrants not yet naturalized - Yes No
f. anyone with a drivers license – Yes - No
# 2. Ages of Voter
g. minimum18 years
h. minimum 21 years
i. minimum 25 years
j. minimum 30 years
k. minimum 33 years
l. minimum 35 years
# 3. Sex of Voter
a. Male – Yes - No
b. Female – Yes - No
c. Non – Binanry - Yes - No
d. Transgender - Yes - No
# 4. Competence of Voter
e. property owners net value over $50,000 - Yes - No
f. property owners net value over $250,000 - Yes - No
g. tax exempt persons – Yes - No
h. those receiving welfare / food stamps – Yes - No
i. those with unpaid child support obligations - Yes - No
j. those receiving WIC – Yes - No
k. those receiving Section 8 – Yes - No
l. those working for government bureaucracies – Yes - No
m. those that will pay a $5000 poll tax - Yes - No
n. those that have paid a minimum of $5000 per year of tax for their combined jurisdictions in excess of any received via SS, Medicare, Medicaid, ATFWDC - Yes - No
# 5. Genetic presence of Voter
a. Male without children – Yes - No
b. Male with children – Yes - No
c. Male with children plural vote – Yes - No
d. Female without children – Yes - No
e. Female with children – Yes - No
f. Female with children plural vote – Yes - No
g. Only married males with children, never divorced can vote. – Yes - No
# 6. Who should be trusted with the responsibility and power of public
office?
a. Only those authorized to vote in the general election - Yes No
b. Male without children – Yes - No
c. Male with children – Yes - No
d. Female without children – Yes - No
e. Female with children – Yes - No
f. Only married males with children, never divorced can hold public office – Yes - No
g. Depends on the office - Yes - No
h. minimum18 years - Yes - No
i. minimum 21 years - Yes - No
j. minimum 25 years - Yes - No
k. minimum 30 years - Yes - No
l. minimum 33 years - Yes - No
m. minimum 35 years - Yes - No
#7. How long should a legally arrived, non-working, never worked in America, elderly
immigrant have to wait before they start collecting social security?
a. Six months
b. One year
c. Two years
d. Five years
e. never
#6. Presently the pharmaceutical companies that make “vaccines” are immune from liability.
QUESTION: should the makers of “vaccines” be immune from product safety liability?
a. Yes
b. No
c. Undecided
YES Pero was a breathe of fresh air tho the "sleeping giant" was still slumbering away far from Awakened, tho slowly incrementally more so Esp over the last 14yrs starting with the TEA PARTY PATRIOTS;
tho the Globalist owned Atheist MarXist's among us didn't take us serious, now WE are getting seriously organized...!
Aaron Siri is the most plausible and coherent speaker on this subject that I have heard. I am very thankful that he is in the position he is in, and not surprised at all that the judge in the Pfizer Papers trial found in favor of this brilliant lawyer. Obviously, Pfizer could not afford to have an honest lawyer...considering their liabilities if they revealed the truth about virtually anything they do. If I need a lawyer, where my life depended upon, I would ask for Aaron Siri. Thank you John Leake for this excellent interview. P.s. Three of my sisters were sterilized and one was paralyzed partially by the polio vaccine. All modern vaccines are harmful weapons it seems.