The continuing posture of mandating mRNA and other vaccines by the government is flat out criminal and violates the Constitution. Health Industry dominates Public Health in America. This must be reversed; informed consent must return as a patient's primary right; and mRNA and related drug treatments suspended if not entirely banned. Enough is Enough!
This "bioweapon" is not a vaccine. It is a gene product that tells your body to make the portion of the virus that cause the inflammation and strokes heart attacks, myocarditis. And apparently may incorporate into cell's DNA.
Word of caution! Amazon is now also carrying a knockoff of the REAL Turtles All the Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth. Anonymous with forward by Mary Holland. The Fake one has near identical cover, misleading title, forward by visually similar name, 1 star ratings as people got burned ordering it. Diabolical.
Dissolving Illusions is also a horrifying must read of Vaccine history. RFKs Fauci book, and Vax/Unvax too.
How sneaky. Perhaps Turtles All the Way Down could change their cover and have the artwork patented, don't know if that can be done, so it is not copies. Actually, is the fake new book breaking patent law? Don't know. If so, they should be sued.
I wondered all the same things you are asking. Seems like it should be illegal. Also since the very beginning I have wondered if they need to reissue it with a title that is not used by any other books because there is an older book Completely unrelated to vaccines with the same name which causes confusion. I wish they would do a new edition with a different cover even if it's just a different color and consider tweaking their title. You know they are making an impact if suddenly knockoffs are being Uploaded. I have read where there has not been a single lawsuit or anything found wrong with the original book. Very chilling
Copied off intellectual property site - "In general, book titles are not eligible for copyright protection. The U.S. Copyright Office views book titles as “short slogans,” not intellectual property. The underlying theory to this notion is that there may be other instances where the same or a similar title is equally appropriate...If copyright protection is not an option, you may be able to register a title as a trademark. Books that are part of an ongoing series sometimes receive trademark protection. For example, ‘Chicken Soup for the [blank]’ is a registered trademark, as is ‘[blank] for Dummies’. Perhaps the most famous example of trademarked book titles are those in the Harry Potter series." Re: a copied cover "Businesses are constantly attempting to divert consumer attention from an established brand to their own products by adopting a similar look. If a person could be legitimately confused and assume the logo or brand was the same, then you have a case for breaking copyright...The lawyer said that the test for this is not how much of the finished work is unique, but instead how much was taken from someone else. Could a consumer become legitimately confused (as mentioned above). When I showed the lawyer the cover of The Emotion Thesaurus, and then The Positive Trait and Negative Trait Thesaurus books, and then the copied Internet Marketing cover, he said in my case, the infringement falls under “Distinguishing Guise.” This means that the “look” of our books is the same and contribute to our established brand...Luckily for us, Amazon agreed without assessment of copyright infringement, and after filling out a legal declaration that we were the copyright holders, they removed the other book from their sites. Hopefully no one was taken in by the copied look, thinking it was somehow associated with us.
I wanted to share this story in case it might help someone else."
Interesting. In this case the covers are near identical, same images with tweaks. Titles exact until subtitle formatted the same. Even the foreword is by a name very similar to Mary Holland.definitely designed to mislead.yes people bought the wrong book but luckily enough have left bad reviews. The times we live in. Discernment is so hard but is everything
I think Mary Holland could urge Amazon not to sell the misleading version. Most people think vaccines are fine, and resent the vaccine risk aware, and box them into the pejorative label of anti-vax. If the risks of vaccines became mainstream, most would change their minds. We really need that shift to occur.
Please speak the truth about these injections. The agenda is documented and the self assembling nanotechnology is also. You are pretending that this is a medical product.
I am so glad parents are now abandoning the COVID vaccines for their children. I would hope that they do their research regarding all other vaccines before inoculating their children.
Dr. McCullough, parents now regret giving their kids the shots. Do you ever ask them why they gave them in the first place, why did they allow their kids to receive an experimental gene product? Do these parents research the ingredients in any of the other vaccines, are they aware of the dangers of aluminum crossing the BBB? Why are parents not doing their own research outside of google bias? Maybe they need to be urged to spend some time doing that for the sake of their kids.
That was common sense to me even back in 2021 - I refused to give any shots to my children. Work even organized teams call to provide details on shots. They didn't have answer (MD led) on change of buffer to TRIS when I asked about it. I know the manager in section over asked me if I got my answer - just told him, yeah enough to not even consider giving it to my kids. My coworker gave all four of her kids (10-16) shots because of their "peer pressure" - I asked her if she was insane or didn't know how to talk to her kids about not following what everyone else is doing. No answer received. Interestingly, in the FB group for our work all of a sudden folks started asking about pediatric cardiologist recommendation for their young children. Since the group was formed end of 2017 that recommendation was never asked before but blew up in 2021.
New Zealand has no compulsory vaccination for children. Instead, vaccination is achieved through stigmatisation of anti vaxxers, fear mongering e.g. talking about babies dying of Whooping Cough and biased government information.
As for America, I think it's time big government was removed from the personal health decisions that parents should be making for their children, save for child abuse situations etc.
To add: The US and New Zealand are the only countries in the world where Phamaceutical advertising is legal and widespread. Realize this constant, in your face and space, selling is one of the main influencers pushing rampant drug use, increasing revenues, and misleading the public in a major way. Like tobacco and alcohol ads in our past, the pharmaceutical advertising should be banned completely. It does enormous harm to our perceptions as a population, and has fundamentally changed the practice of medicine from what once was "identify the primary lesion in a patient and treat that, never throw drugs at symptoms" (prior to 1980) into "prescribe drugs specifically for symptoms". This had completely turned our former public health system, once the jewel and envy of the world, into a tool for the drug companies.
I live in New Zealand and we do indeed have drug advertisements. Also, alcohol advertising, but this has to air after 9:30pm so as to not influence children.
I agree with you, repetitive messaging has an effect. I can easily remember several pharmaceutical adverts, they really do stay with you, even years after they air on TV!
Please stop calling it “vaccine hesitancy.” Perhaps “vaccine resistant” would be a more accurate term. “Hesitant” implies an uncertainty and one who might be persuaded to go only with the non-vaccine vax.
The continuing posture of mandating mRNA and other vaccines by the government is flat out criminal and violates the Constitution. Health Industry dominates Public Health in America. This must be reversed; informed consent must return as a patient's primary right; and mRNA and related drug treatments suspended if not entirely banned. Enough is Enough!
"Turtles all the way down" says it all. ALL vaccines are poisons.
Yes, great book
Another well researched book on the topic is 'Dissolving Illusions'
Yep, I have that.
This "bioweapon" is not a vaccine. It is a gene product that tells your body to make the portion of the virus that cause the inflammation and strokes heart attacks, myocarditis. And apparently may incorporate into cell's DNA.
Word of caution! Amazon is now also carrying a knockoff of the REAL Turtles All the Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth. Anonymous with forward by Mary Holland. The Fake one has near identical cover, misleading title, forward by visually similar name, 1 star ratings as people got burned ordering it. Diabolical.
Dissolving Illusions is also a horrifying must read of Vaccine history. RFKs Fauci book, and Vax/Unvax too.
How sneaky. Perhaps Turtles All the Way Down could change their cover and have the artwork patented, don't know if that can be done, so it is not copies. Actually, is the fake new book breaking patent law? Don't know. If so, they should be sued.
I wondered all the same things you are asking. Seems like it should be illegal. Also since the very beginning I have wondered if they need to reissue it with a title that is not used by any other books because there is an older book Completely unrelated to vaccines with the same name which causes confusion. I wish they would do a new edition with a different cover even if it's just a different color and consider tweaking their title. You know they are making an impact if suddenly knockoffs are being Uploaded. I have read where there has not been a single lawsuit or anything found wrong with the original book. Very chilling
Copied off intellectual property site - "In general, book titles are not eligible for copyright protection. The U.S. Copyright Office views book titles as “short slogans,” not intellectual property. The underlying theory to this notion is that there may be other instances where the same or a similar title is equally appropriate...If copyright protection is not an option, you may be able to register a title as a trademark. Books that are part of an ongoing series sometimes receive trademark protection. For example, ‘Chicken Soup for the [blank]’ is a registered trademark, as is ‘[blank] for Dummies’. Perhaps the most famous example of trademarked book titles are those in the Harry Potter series." Re: a copied cover "Businesses are constantly attempting to divert consumer attention from an established brand to their own products by adopting a similar look. If a person could be legitimately confused and assume the logo or brand was the same, then you have a case for breaking copyright...The lawyer said that the test for this is not how much of the finished work is unique, but instead how much was taken from someone else. Could a consumer become legitimately confused (as mentioned above). When I showed the lawyer the cover of The Emotion Thesaurus, and then The Positive Trait and Negative Trait Thesaurus books, and then the copied Internet Marketing cover, he said in my case, the infringement falls under “Distinguishing Guise.” This means that the “look” of our books is the same and contribute to our established brand...Luckily for us, Amazon agreed without assessment of copyright infringement, and after filling out a legal declaration that we were the copyright holders, they removed the other book from their sites. Hopefully no one was taken in by the copied look, thinking it was somehow associated with us.
I wanted to share this story in case it might help someone else."
Interesting. In this case the covers are near identical, same images with tweaks. Titles exact until subtitle formatted the same. Even the foreword is by a name very similar to Mary Holland.definitely designed to mislead.yes people bought the wrong book but luckily enough have left bad reviews. The times we live in. Discernment is so hard but is everything
I think Mary Holland could urge Amazon not to sell the misleading version. Most people think vaccines are fine, and resent the vaccine risk aware, and box them into the pejorative label of anti-vax. If the risks of vaccines became mainstream, most would change their minds. We really need that shift to occur.
It's "out of print" now. ;-)
check the reviews: https://www.amazon.com/Search-Turtles-Truth-Vaccination-Comprehensive/dp/B0DND327TR/ref=sr_1_4
Please speak the truth about these injections. The agenda is documented and the self assembling nanotechnology is also. You are pretending that this is a medical product.
I volunteer to carry the wood for the gallows.
I am so glad parents are now abandoning the COVID vaccines for their children. I would hope that they do their research regarding all other vaccines before inoculating their children.
Dr. McCullough, parents now regret giving their kids the shots. Do you ever ask them why they gave them in the first place, why did they allow their kids to receive an experimental gene product? Do these parents research the ingredients in any of the other vaccines, are they aware of the dangers of aluminum crossing the BBB? Why are parents not doing their own research outside of google bias? Maybe they need to be urged to spend some time doing that for the sake of their kids.
They should be firmly against the CV19 vax... and ALL others.
That was common sense to me even back in 2021 - I refused to give any shots to my children. Work even organized teams call to provide details on shots. They didn't have answer (MD led) on change of buffer to TRIS when I asked about it. I know the manager in section over asked me if I got my answer - just told him, yeah enough to not even consider giving it to my kids. My coworker gave all four of her kids (10-16) shots because of their "peer pressure" - I asked her if she was insane or didn't know how to talk to her kids about not following what everyone else is doing. No answer received. Interestingly, in the FB group for our work all of a sudden folks started asking about pediatric cardiologist recommendation for their young children. Since the group was formed end of 2017 that recommendation was never asked before but blew up in 2021.
New Zealand has no compulsory vaccination for children. Instead, vaccination is achieved through stigmatisation of anti vaxxers, fear mongering e.g. talking about babies dying of Whooping Cough and biased government information.
As for America, I think it's time big government was removed from the personal health decisions that parents should be making for their children, save for child abuse situations etc.
To add: The US and New Zealand are the only countries in the world where Phamaceutical advertising is legal and widespread. Realize this constant, in your face and space, selling is one of the main influencers pushing rampant drug use, increasing revenues, and misleading the public in a major way. Like tobacco and alcohol ads in our past, the pharmaceutical advertising should be banned completely. It does enormous harm to our perceptions as a population, and has fundamentally changed the practice of medicine from what once was "identify the primary lesion in a patient and treat that, never throw drugs at symptoms" (prior to 1980) into "prescribe drugs specifically for symptoms". This had completely turned our former public health system, once the jewel and envy of the world, into a tool for the drug companies.
I live in New Zealand and we do indeed have drug advertisements. Also, alcohol advertising, but this has to air after 9:30pm so as to not influence children.
I agree with you, repetitive messaging has an effect. I can easily remember several pharmaceutical adverts, they really do stay with you, even years after they air on TV!
GO FOR 100% Resistance to this Devil's Brew!!!
Please stop calling it “vaccine hesitancy.” Perhaps “vaccine resistant” would be a more accurate term. “Hesitant” implies an uncertainty and one who might be persuaded to go only with the non-vaccine vax.
Correction of typo, …go along with….
BTW, what happened to the editing feature for my Substack replies? Also, I cannot copy any replies, not even my own. I view Substack on an iPad.