These people (?) are monsters. Why we permit them to exist and prey upon us is beyond me. The sooner collapse hits the US, the better for Humankind. We are infested with and controlled by clinically certifiable psychopaths at all levels - with a demented hair sniffer as captain of the ship.
OMG! I cannot believe these people persist on doing this. The issue of vaccinating pregnant women for diseases of negligible importance should be one of ethical principles and not scientific considerations. It is unacceptable to intentionally expose a pregnant woman to a potentially harmful intervention as an "experiment". This study should not have been approved by an IRB. Then, after the fact, the results are so bad. They insist on reporting RRR, which was bad anyway. The ARR was negligible; out of > 3,500 participants per group, only 24 and 56 subjects had the "outcome of interest". The shame, as usual, is that authors continue to conclude that their results are so good... in order to have their articles published. It is disgusting.
I sincerely hope the FDA does not approve yet another failed Pfizer drug. About time the FDA got some credibility and refuse drug company rep membership of the FDA or donations. HUUUGE conflict of interest, with the public most assuredly coming off second best - always.
Having worked for years screening subjects for clinical trials with every large and some emerging pharma companies, I’m glad to have left the field over a decade ago. Pregnant women were verboten and the pediatric trials we worked on were for life-threatening therapeutics. This “new frontier” is irresponsible, immoral, and dangerous. I imagine the physician payments must be much larger than normal - and they were hefty then. Many clinicians have lost their way. Abhorrent.
Thanks for explaining the process. Do the subjects of the clinical trials get paid? Why else would any pregnant woman volunteer to use her unborn baby as a guinea pig?
Subjects unless in Phase 1 (first time in man) trials are not usually paid, but offered medical care related to the trial condition (asthma, pneumonia, etc.). Physicians, or Principal Investigators (PI’s) are paid per patient evaluated and enrolled in the trial (after further in-person screening and labs, if any, and Informed Consent confirmed.) PI’s are judged on whether they fulfill or exceed their recruitment commitments - it’s a legitimate business. However, how was Informed Consent done on this novel compound (the vax), especially when a placebo was not used? With vaxxes, often the adjuvant or a precious vax, not an inert saline solution is used. “Turtles All the Way Down” is a challenging read if not in this space, but I found it chilling.
It’s astounding to me that pregnant women enrolled and I’m guessing it’s because their physicians encouraged it - or they were in deep fear over the virus.
To name such a fake and dangerous trial after one of the most famous artists of the French Impressionist era is an act of hubris beyond comprehension! The art of Matisse was beyond compare for its gentle yet powerful depiction of nature and dedication to the beauty of human form. But it's Pfizer, the poison pushing drug cartel responsible for the deaths of innocents so not surprising. Open the gates of hell for these monsters!
The results of the Pfizer trials on pregnant women with Covid vaccine prove that Pfizer has no reluctance to injure, kill, pregnant women and their babies.
Until the 1986 Act of "UNAVOIDABLY UNSAFE" Umbrella of "0" liability of any Vaccine injury is washed away and deleted from any .GOV laws protecting the Medical mafia. "We" are their trial study data victims and crash test dummies as such. BIGpHARMA = .GOV Captured Conglomerate.
My question is where are they finding pregnant women stupid or ignorant to gamble with their pregnancies and join these clinical trials? After the past 3 years, there is no excuse for being this ignorant. The information is out there. This is unconscionable.
RSV in my patients was rapidly reversed with Xlear. The best explanation for how comes from Bill Costerton, writing in Scientific American in Jan. 1978 (doi: 1.0.1038/scientificamerican0178-8). He posits three methods and xylitol fits with them all.
There will still be the dutiful stooges who will roll up their sleeves and get the poison if the government says they should. (Jim Jones, Guyana Kool Aid) How much money will doctors get paid for each shot they give? And they cry about vaccine hesitancy! RFK Jr. this is your new crusade! Stupid is as stupid does.
It appears the only reason these pharmaceutical companies test any of their products today is to measure if their countermeasures fulfill their globalist goals of enough death and destruction? Their products appear to have nothing to do with the health of human beings?
All so shameful!
Thank you for your comment!
You are right!
Americans are being attacked so fast on so many fronts EVERYDAY that everyone is reacting to yesterday…instead of forward acting to get in front of the fast moving train heading towards us to derail it!
How will we derail the train heading towards us without unity and serious strategic war planners to lead us to win?
These people (?) are monsters. Why we permit them to exist and prey upon us is beyond me. The sooner collapse hits the US, the better for Humankind. We are infested with and controlled by clinically certifiable psychopaths at all levels - with a demented hair sniffer as captain of the ship.
What idiot subjects themselves to these things? You have to be CRAZY - I blame the women -
OMG! I cannot believe these people persist on doing this. The issue of vaccinating pregnant women for diseases of negligible importance should be one of ethical principles and not scientific considerations. It is unacceptable to intentionally expose a pregnant woman to a potentially harmful intervention as an "experiment". This study should not have been approved by an IRB. Then, after the fact, the results are so bad. They insist on reporting RRR, which was bad anyway. The ARR was negligible; out of > 3,500 participants per group, only 24 and 56 subjects had the "outcome of interest". The shame, as usual, is that authors continue to conclude that their results are so good... in order to have their articles published. It is disgusting.
Your comment about the IRBs is good. We need to have IRBs that do their job with integrity.
I sincerely hope the FDA does not approve yet another failed Pfizer drug. About time the FDA got some credibility and refuse drug company rep membership of the FDA or donations. HUUUGE conflict of interest, with the public most assuredly coming off second best - always.
The FDA will waive this through if they have the opportunity. They are irredeemably corrupt.
Having worked for years screening subjects for clinical trials with every large and some emerging pharma companies, I’m glad to have left the field over a decade ago. Pregnant women were verboten and the pediatric trials we worked on were for life-threatening therapeutics. This “new frontier” is irresponsible, immoral, and dangerous. I imagine the physician payments must be much larger than normal - and they were hefty then. Many clinicians have lost their way. Abhorrent.
Thanks for explaining the process. Do the subjects of the clinical trials get paid? Why else would any pregnant woman volunteer to use her unborn baby as a guinea pig?
Subjects unless in Phase 1 (first time in man) trials are not usually paid, but offered medical care related to the trial condition (asthma, pneumonia, etc.). Physicians, or Principal Investigators (PI’s) are paid per patient evaluated and enrolled in the trial (after further in-person screening and labs, if any, and Informed Consent confirmed.) PI’s are judged on whether they fulfill or exceed their recruitment commitments - it’s a legitimate business. However, how was Informed Consent done on this novel compound (the vax), especially when a placebo was not used? With vaxxes, often the adjuvant or a precious vax, not an inert saline solution is used. “Turtles All the Way Down” is a challenging read if not in this space, but I found it chilling.
It’s astounding to me that pregnant women enrolled and I’m guessing it’s because their physicians encouraged it - or they were in deep fear over the virus.
Previous not precious. Typo. Sorry
Thank you. Appreciate this information. I'll check out "Turtles..."
To name such a fake and dangerous trial after one of the most famous artists of the French Impressionist era is an act of hubris beyond comprehension! The art of Matisse was beyond compare for its gentle yet powerful depiction of nature and dedication to the beauty of human form. But it's Pfizer, the poison pushing drug cartel responsible for the deaths of innocents so not surprising. Open the gates of hell for these monsters!
The results of the Pfizer trials on pregnant women with Covid vaccine prove that Pfizer has no reluctance to injure, kill, pregnant women and their babies.
Until the 1986 Act of "UNAVOIDABLY UNSAFE" Umbrella of "0" liability of any Vaccine injury is washed away and deleted from any .GOV laws protecting the Medical mafia. "We" are their trial study data victims and crash test dummies as such. BIGpHARMA = .GOV Captured Conglomerate.
My question is where are they finding pregnant women stupid or ignorant to gamble with their pregnancies and join these clinical trials? After the past 3 years, there is no excuse for being this ignorant. The information is out there. This is unconscionable.
RSV in my patients was rapidly reversed with Xlear. The best explanation for how comes from Bill Costerton, writing in Scientific American in Jan. 1978 (doi: 1.0.1038/scientificamerican0178-8). He posits three methods and xylitol fits with them all.
.
There will still be the dutiful stooges who will roll up their sleeves and get the poison if the government says they should. (Jim Jones, Guyana Kool Aid) How much money will doctors get paid for each shot they give? And they cry about vaccine hesitancy! RFK Jr. this is your new crusade! Stupid is as stupid does.
Peter,
I do not understand why you do not have your own substack as you stick to the serious science issues where your VERY clear expertise is?
Scientists and doctors in mass EVERYWHERE are making a mess, weighing in on political issues!
How did science and medicine get so politicized and how can we ever survive that?
Just a suggestion…John Leake might should get his own substack separate from yours as you stick appropriately to medicine and science.
His focus today is on CENSORSHIP IN THE UK. I will reserve my comment here as I have already commented at his substack…
Thank you for your work and sacrifices to help America which helps the rest of the world, too!
Regards,
Mother/Grandmother of 7 and counting
This is insane. Who volunteers for these trials?!
Horrible.
Peter and all,
It appears the only reason these pharmaceutical companies test any of their products today is to measure if their countermeasures fulfill their globalist goals of enough death and destruction? Their products appear to have nothing to do with the health of human beings?
All so shameful!
Thank you for your comment!
You are right!
Americans are being attacked so fast on so many fronts EVERYDAY that everyone is reacting to yesterday…instead of forward acting to get in front of the fast moving train heading towards us to derail it!
How will we derail the train heading towards us without unity and serious strategic war planners to lead us to win?
Regards!
Doctors have lost their Mindsand you can't believe half the things they tell you anymore.