The entire charade was distressing. The man is an intellectual titan, that doesn’t speak in hateful sound bites, like the rest of these pharma trolls. They just wouldn’t let him talk! Gotcha hearings like this are impossible when trying to impart scientific ideas, studies, or data. Bernie, the onesie-gate creater, whom I voted for twice, had some kind of nerve! If he had supported RFK’s presidency, we would have universal healthcare.
This administration, hopefully including RFK Jr, has some MAJOR dirty housecleaning to do, beginning with the alphabet agencies!! Then the American people need to use their voting power to clean out the Senate!! There's obviously a LOT to undo from the last administration, but we can't move forward positively if the dirt is still lying about (intentional use of the word "lying") and creating obstacles and obstructions (again, intentional use of "obstruction" - to justice). God help us!🙏
It’s because people don’t wanna believe the truth. They’ve been fed alive for so long that they believe the lie they need to wake up and smell the coffee.
I haven’t watched the proceedings because I knew they would make me SO IRRITATED!!! (And this clip and the one earlier with Bernie proves it!!).
I’m just praying God’s will be done, and trusting whatever the outcome, RFKjr will be used in some capacity. I’m sure Trump has a plan, and God definitely does!
She did not listen! Judgement by her is expected but she has no knowledge of the science put forward! Cowardly response by her, did not even listen to JFK jr response! Another brainwashed politician.
"AH: You all have been to the idea of the third rail in each of your fields, like where would you not go? And I would love to hear a story or an example of a time when you said “I’m not going to go there. I’m not going to play God.” Have any one of you had a moment like that?
GC: Well, I don’t think we’re in any danger of playing a major deity, but we’re, we could certainly do, there’s a line which we don’t cross. There’s some things which I don’t even discuss, until many years later when someone else thinks of the same idea.
An example of that was, personalized weapons, biological weapons, when you make a weapon that is specific for a particular person. And I kept that a secret, I didn’t tell anybody for about a decade. And then somebody else who I happen to know thought about it independently and was planning on publishing it in The Atlantic, and I said to him, “do you really want to do this, I mean this is enabling, for no particular purpose?” And it was framed in terms of Barack Obama being the target. And I just thought it was a, that’s an example of a line that I didn’t cross and I wouldn’t. But it did, and it was published, so.
AH: Should the decision not to publish something that in the hands of the wrong people could wreak devastation be a matter for government regulation?
GC: Both ideas I did share because I do think that other people are thinking about. Just they’re a rare one every now and again that it seems like there could buy us an extra ten years if I shut up. But I think because we talk about these ideas so far in advance, the ones we think that we can protect, that we do, that the ethics can stay ahead of technology. Not just catch up, but stay ahead, so we, the, the world of science fiction writers, the Hollywood, can come up with scenarios that are well outside our technical capabilities, but are inside our abilities to have a discussion among the entire population by introducing it to millions of television or movie watchers for example, or book readers, magazine readers. That is how we start the discussion before it is technically possible. And then many of these, we’ve been worrying about designer babies since before the first IVF in 1978. That’s an example of something that the ethics especially got ahead of the technology."
Leading Doctors Discussed Creating Ethical Medical Miracles at the TIME 100 Summit
“Speaking at the first Time 100 Summit in New York City on Tuesday, prominent geneticist George Church admitted that for about 10 years, he knew biological weapons could be specifically targeted to individual people. But he kept it to himself.
Church, a professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School, participated in a panel discussing how to introduce breakthroughs in medicine”
“Church is among the first scientists to appreciate that DNA and genes would become the biological currency of this century. He has contributed to critical advancements in gene editing, which remains controversial for its enormous power to permanently alter the human gene pool, as well as that of plants and animals. Gene editing could make it possible to erase lethal diseases, produce higher crop yields and even create healthier foods. But genetic manipulation, taken to another extreme, can create super bugs and even possibly create super humans with enhanced abilities to think, move and alter their world. Current regulations, social norms and cultures have been slow to address how best to apply these possible changes to the human experience.”
“The final panelist, Pardis Sabeti, joined the call for needing more humanity in applying scientific advances. She’s a professor in Harvard University’s Center for Systems Biology and Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology.
Sabeti played a key role in directing the emergency response to the Ebola epidemic in western Africa that began in 2013 and culminated in 2016. She and her team sequenced samples of the Ebola virus isolated from those who were infected in order to determine, real time, how the infections were spreading. That helped public health experts decide on the most effective control strategies by tracing patients’ immediate contacts and ensuring that those at highest risk of spreading the virus were properly supported and monitored.
“The problem with the way we quarantined people during the [Ebola] outbreak early on was that it was draconian,” she said, “It made people feel isolated. I wrote a memo for people in the Pentagon and the President’s office a week into the outbreak that we need Disney involved. We need a food court, we need people who know how to help people get in and out of the [Hazmat] suits and make people who are infected know that they are secure and loved, not isolated. I believe in quarantine; it is effective. But I think our entire culture about the way we think about quarantine needs to change so we engage each other as partners.””
This past May, Harvard University (where I teach) issued a report on its relationship with the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. It was an admirably forthright mea culpa highlighting three areas of concern. The second was the mockery made of academic standards when, after donating $200,000 to the psychology department, Epstein was appointed as a visiting fellow there despite a complete lack of appropriate academic qualifications. The third was his close connection to Harvard's Program for Evolutionary Dynamics (PED).
But more than two thirds of Epstein's donations—$6.5 million—went to PED director Martin Nowak. Epstein encouraged others to give another $2 million to geneticist George Church.
What made it even worse was that Epstein was a latter-day eugenicist whose interests were tied to a delusional notion of seeding the human race with his own DNA. Given this stance, it is particularly disturbing that he focused his largesse on research on the genetic basis of human behavior. Human genetics is an ethically sensitive and intellectually contested domain where it behooves us to ensure that the highest standards of scientific rigor are in place and that nongenetic explanations for behavior are given a fair chance to compete.
Jeffrey Epstein donated $9m to Harvard before 2008 guilty plea, says university
“The disclosure that Harvard declined Epstein’s contributions after he was convicted for soliciting a minor are in marked contrast to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and its Media Lab, which has been rocked by revelations that it accepted more than $7.5m in donations from Epstein or people connected to the university through him after his conviction.
Amid a review of Epstein donations to MIT, the university’s president, Rafael Reif, acknowledged Thursday he apparently thanked Epstein in a note in 2012 in response to one donation."
And so is another panelist from the same forum. Pardis Sabeti. Daughter of the Shah of Iran's brutal secret police, SAVAK, leader, Parviz Sabeti. "The most feared man in Iran." So feared they overthrew the Shah to put an Ayatollah in place. They are eugenicists, remember, apples don't fall far from the tree according to their own worldview, ethics. A major player in the pandemic tyranny.
Yes. RFK Jr, was describing a well-known capability of the biomedical, bioterror industry, targeted death.
Read more at this long, winding, Magic Carpet Ride Stack:
Even if RFK isn't selected a great deal of the corruption has been shone upon in the Senate. People will be shouting for transparency and health for their children. Many have been harmed or killed by the Covid shots. They won't stand for this any longer. (spoken by a neighbour to the north)
I watched both clown shows: the one yesterday and the one today. Some of the Dems are very stupid or are pretending to be very stupid. I'm not sure which behavior (actual stupidity or pretend stupidity) is more frightening when displayed by top-level US lawmakers.
Their "questions" were not questions at all. They were agenda-driven attacks & verbal assaults. They were not the least bit interested in what he had to say, hence all of the "yes"/"no" "questions" that actually required more information from him, for which he was not allowed to provide. It is a despicable & transparent strategy & they knew full-well what they were doing.
Don't those senators understand that everything they bring up will raise questions in the minds of people? Duh? All of their questions can be answered in due time ...or even sooner. They have made themselves look very bad. Look, a majority voted for Trump KNOWING he was going to have RFK on board. Big Pharma shills....elevator 'down'.
The people that are bothered by the color of their skin are still dwelling on the past. Most Americans are looking to the future and we are all color blind. Which everyone should be. Look at the character and reputation of a person before you question them. Look at yourself also and do try to reflect before you open your yap trap. Try not to act like a libtard. (Yes it’s in the dictionary- for those who are woke ;-)
This makes total sense as I remember (from Vaxxed movie?) the black children in the old MMR studies fared much worse than others? Would it be related to that?
It is both ironic and shocking that the black woman senator from Maryland, Angela Alsobrooks, was so offended when RFK asserted that different races may need different doses of drugs. Does she think that people of different ages, weights, or severity of illness should be given different doses of medicines? How about genetic make-up, such as race. Yeah...we might have a lot of similarity as human beings, but there is a LOT of individual biochemical and physiological make-up that is unique to each person.
Alsobrooks' over-simplistic thinking about health and medicine is so "woke" that she is asleep to realizing the biological/biochemical/psychosocial idiosyncrasies that make us all individuals. We are NOT all clones of each other! Wake up...without woking up!
Kennedy has more brains and integrity than all of these corrupt hypocrites combined.
Our Congress is packed chock full of sanctimonius, low IQ fools & it's maddening.
I used to think I would suffer from brain fog for the rest of my life..."𝐛𝐮𝐭" this changed everything.... https://t.co/rrZYLFLlGx
RFK Jr. Announces $5.6 Quadrillion Lawsuit vs Vaccine Injuries, Covid Measures & Crimes Against Humanity vs Bernie Sanders in Senate Hearing citing VAERS & VSAFE @ Ron Johnson (NurembergTrials.net) https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/rfk-jr-announces-56-quadrillion-lawsuit
Yes, but does he have the votes? The show is not the count.
;-(
NOTANINJUN was awful, she is ignorant and evil and worried that her gravy train is going to come to an end!
The entire charade was distressing. The man is an intellectual titan, that doesn’t speak in hateful sound bites, like the rest of these pharma trolls. They just wouldn’t let him talk! Gotcha hearings like this are impossible when trying to impart scientific ideas, studies, or data. Bernie, the onesie-gate creater, whom I voted for twice, had some kind of nerve! If he had supported RFK’s presidency, we would have universal healthcare.
Yes, Bernie, whom I really liked in the past, was disgusting. Showed his true colors.
well said!
I never liked him, I just had a sense. Now I know why!!
All dems and some republicans have taken millions from big pharmaceutical companies.
How? How can they legally do that and not automatically be put in jail. For life??
Because the lawyers and judges taking those cases are in the same beds
Ahhh. I get it.......:(
This administration, hopefully including RFK Jr, has some MAJOR dirty housecleaning to do, beginning with the alphabet agencies!! Then the American people need to use their voting power to clean out the Senate!! There's obviously a LOT to undo from the last administration, but we can't move forward positively if the dirt is still lying about (intentional use of the word "lying") and creating obstacles and obstructions (again, intentional use of "obstruction" - to justice). God help us!🙏
It’s because people don’t wanna believe the truth. They’ve been fed alive for so long that they believe the lie they need to wake up and smell the coffee.
I haven’t watched the proceedings because I knew they would make me SO IRRITATED!!! (And this clip and the one earlier with Bernie proves it!!).
I’m just praying God’s will be done, and trusting whatever the outcome, RFKjr will be used in some capacity. I’m sure Trump has a plan, and God definitely does!
I have to takes breaks. Today I did crossfit and then went back to watching. I felt better
Yes. Praying. Yes. God does.
She did not listen! Judgement by her is expected but she has no knowledge of the science put forward! Cowardly response by her, did not even listen to JFK jr response! Another brainwashed politician.
Yes, well-documented scientific evidence. So well known the subject was even featured at the Time100 Summit in 2019:
Dr. George Church, Dr. Giuliana Testa, Dr. Pardis Sabeti (Ariana Huffington moderator)
Creating Medical Miracles, Ethically, April 23, 2019
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/dr-george-church-dr-giuliana-214036340.html
Transcript (02:49)
"AH: You all have been to the idea of the third rail in each of your fields, like where would you not go? And I would love to hear a story or an example of a time when you said “I’m not going to go there. I’m not going to play God.” Have any one of you had a moment like that?
GC: Well, I don’t think we’re in any danger of playing a major deity, but we’re, we could certainly do, there’s a line which we don’t cross. There’s some things which I don’t even discuss, until many years later when someone else thinks of the same idea.
An example of that was, personalized weapons, biological weapons, when you make a weapon that is specific for a particular person. And I kept that a secret, I didn’t tell anybody for about a decade. And then somebody else who I happen to know thought about it independently and was planning on publishing it in The Atlantic, and I said to him, “do you really want to do this, I mean this is enabling, for no particular purpose?” And it was framed in terms of Barack Obama being the target. And I just thought it was a, that’s an example of a line that I didn’t cross and I wouldn’t. But it did, and it was published, so.
AH: Should the decision not to publish something that in the hands of the wrong people could wreak devastation be a matter for government regulation?
GC: Both ideas I did share because I do think that other people are thinking about. Just they’re a rare one every now and again that it seems like there could buy us an extra ten years if I shut up. But I think because we talk about these ideas so far in advance, the ones we think that we can protect, that we do, that the ethics can stay ahead of technology. Not just catch up, but stay ahead, so we, the, the world of science fiction writers, the Hollywood, can come up with scenarios that are well outside our technical capabilities, but are inside our abilities to have a discussion among the entire population by introducing it to millions of television or movie watchers for example, or book readers, magazine readers. That is how we start the discussion before it is technically possible. And then many of these, we’ve been worrying about designer babies since before the first IVF in 1978. That’s an example of something that the ethics especially got ahead of the technology."
Leading Doctors Discussed Creating Ethical Medical Miracles at the TIME 100 Summit
Time Magazine, April 23, 2019
https://time.com/5574168/doctors-ethical-medical-miracles-time-100-summit/
“Speaking at the first Time 100 Summit in New York City on Tuesday, prominent geneticist George Church admitted that for about 10 years, he knew biological weapons could be specifically targeted to individual people. But he kept it to himself.
Church, a professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School, participated in a panel discussing how to introduce breakthroughs in medicine”
“Church is among the first scientists to appreciate that DNA and genes would become the biological currency of this century. He has contributed to critical advancements in gene editing, which remains controversial for its enormous power to permanently alter the human gene pool, as well as that of plants and animals. Gene editing could make it possible to erase lethal diseases, produce higher crop yields and even create healthier foods. But genetic manipulation, taken to another extreme, can create super bugs and even possibly create super humans with enhanced abilities to think, move and alter their world. Current regulations, social norms and cultures have been slow to address how best to apply these possible changes to the human experience.”
“The final panelist, Pardis Sabeti, joined the call for needing more humanity in applying scientific advances. She’s a professor in Harvard University’s Center for Systems Biology and Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology.
Sabeti played a key role in directing the emergency response to the Ebola epidemic in western Africa that began in 2013 and culminated in 2016. She and her team sequenced samples of the Ebola virus isolated from those who were infected in order to determine, real time, how the infections were spreading. That helped public health experts decide on the most effective control strategies by tracing patients’ immediate contacts and ensuring that those at highest risk of spreading the virus were properly supported and monitored.
“The problem with the way we quarantined people during the [Ebola] outbreak early on was that it was draconian,” she said, “It made people feel isolated. I wrote a memo for people in the Pentagon and the President’s office a week into the outbreak that we need Disney involved. We need a food court, we need people who know how to help people get in and out of the [Hazmat] suits and make people who are infected know that they are secure and loved, not isolated. I believe in quarantine; it is effective. But I think our entire culture about the way we think about quarantine needs to change so we engage each other as partners.””
And George Church is an interesting fellow. With very interesting connections:
Jeffrey Epstein’s Harvard Connections Show How Money Can Distort Research
Scientific American, September 1, 2020
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/jeffrey-epsteins-harvard-connections-show-how-money-can-distort-research/
This past May, Harvard University (where I teach) issued a report on its relationship with the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. It was an admirably forthright mea culpa highlighting three areas of concern. The second was the mockery made of academic standards when, after donating $200,000 to the psychology department, Epstein was appointed as a visiting fellow there despite a complete lack of appropriate academic qualifications. The third was his close connection to Harvard's Program for Evolutionary Dynamics (PED).
But more than two thirds of Epstein's donations—$6.5 million—went to PED director Martin Nowak. Epstein encouraged others to give another $2 million to geneticist George Church.
What made it even worse was that Epstein was a latter-day eugenicist whose interests were tied to a delusional notion of seeding the human race with his own DNA. Given this stance, it is particularly disturbing that he focused his largesse on research on the genetic basis of human behavior. Human genetics is an ethically sensitive and intellectually contested domain where it behooves us to ensure that the highest standards of scientific rigor are in place and that nongenetic explanations for behavior are given a fair chance to compete.
Jeffrey Epstein donated $9m to Harvard before 2008 guilty plea, says university
UK Guardian, September 13, 2019
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/sep/13/jeffrey-epstein-harvard-donations
“The disclosure that Harvard declined Epstein’s contributions after he was convicted for soliciting a minor are in marked contrast to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and its Media Lab, which has been rocked by revelations that it accepted more than $7.5m in donations from Epstein or people connected to the university through him after his conviction.
Amid a review of Epstein donations to MIT, the university’s president, Rafael Reif, acknowledged Thursday he apparently thanked Epstein in a note in 2012 in response to one donation."
And so is another panelist from the same forum. Pardis Sabeti. Daughter of the Shah of Iran's brutal secret police, SAVAK, leader, Parviz Sabeti. "The most feared man in Iran." So feared they overthrew the Shah to put an Ayatollah in place. They are eugenicists, remember, apples don't fall far from the tree according to their own worldview, ethics. A major player in the pandemic tyranny.
Yes. RFK Jr, was describing a well-known capability of the biomedical, bioterror industry, targeted death.
Read more at this long, winding, Magic Carpet Ride Stack:
https://freedomfox.substack.com/p/step-in-foxs-magic-carpet-ride
Even if RFK isn't selected a great deal of the corruption has been shone upon in the Senate. People will be shouting for transparency and health for their children. Many have been harmed or killed by the Covid shots. They won't stand for this any longer. (spoken by a neighbour to the north)
I watched both clown shows: the one yesterday and the one today. Some of the Dems are very stupid or are pretending to be very stupid. I'm not sure which behavior (actual stupidity or pretend stupidity) is more frightening when displayed by top-level US lawmakers.
I think the opposition is largely supremely ignorant, didn’t bother to really look at the evidence.
Their "questions" were not questions at all. They were agenda-driven attacks & verbal assaults. They were not the least bit interested in what he had to say, hence all of the "yes"/"no" "questions" that actually required more information from him, for which he was not allowed to provide. It is a despicable & transparent strategy & they knew full-well what they were doing.
Don't those senators understand that everything they bring up will raise questions in the minds of people? Duh? All of their questions can be answered in due time ...or even sooner. They have made themselves look very bad. Look, a majority voted for Trump KNOWING he was going to have RFK on board. Big Pharma shills....elevator 'down'.
The people that are bothered by the color of their skin are still dwelling on the past. Most Americans are looking to the future and we are all color blind. Which everyone should be. Look at the character and reputation of a person before you question them. Look at yourself also and do try to reflect before you open your yap trap. Try not to act like a libtard. (Yes it’s in the dictionary- for those who are woke ;-)
This makes total sense as I remember (from Vaxxed movie?) the black children in the old MMR studies fared much worse than others? Would it be related to that?
It is both ironic and shocking that the black woman senator from Maryland, Angela Alsobrooks, was so offended when RFK asserted that different races may need different doses of drugs. Does she think that people of different ages, weights, or severity of illness should be given different doses of medicines? How about genetic make-up, such as race. Yeah...we might have a lot of similarity as human beings, but there is a LOT of individual biochemical and physiological make-up that is unique to each person.
Alsobrooks' over-simplistic thinking about health and medicine is so "woke" that she is asleep to realizing the biological/biochemical/psychosocial idiosyncrasies that make us all individuals. We are NOT all clones of each other! Wake up...without woking up!
You say they are lying bout RFK Jr.?
Must be another day ending in a "Y!"
Click to read my take on the hearings!
"Thinking the unthinkable"