179 Comments

Divide and Conquer, that's Their Marxist Quest.

Expand full comment

Similar to Mao's Red Guard, they divided by class. The strategy is being used in America with race.

Expand full comment

The marxists first tried creating strife and disunity using class / wealth, but too many lower income people became middle and upper level wealthy because that's how America's system works. So they switched to using something that cannot be changed (excluding the late Michael Jackson): skin color. A unified people cannot be easily conquered.

Expand full comment

Good point

Expand full comment

Yes this is the basis of Woke. Woke is Cultural Marxism.

Cultural Marxism is rebranded Marxism because the original version wasn't working on western people as you said.

Expand full comment

"Marxist Quest" etc = Satanic.

It is an age-old Power Struggle between God and Satan.

Expand full comment

Sowing division certainly aids authoritarian attempts to seize power however I would argue the overarching intent of this particular nonsense narrative is to control and enlist those susceptible to such empty rhetoric. Have you noticed that authoritarian political ideologues who call everyone they can control "racist" are the only ones who are actually obsessed with race? And the realty is they couldn't care less about minorities they just find them useful. The desire is to conjure a narrative that can be used to manipulate everyone else. Other groups are divided and exploited in the same manner for the same reason (e.g. gay people). Then they attempt to bully those they can't control into compliance with baseless name calling. Incidentally, that is how children behave (authoritarian political ideologues fancy themselves intellectuals but in reality they are remarkably juvenile). To rationally evaluate the behavior of profoundly self centered, pathologically deceitful power lusting sociopaths we must first understand they are not mentally well individuals.

Note, an important distinction must be made between the small cohort of pathological authoritarians who, tragically, have insinuated their way into positions of power in our country and the substantial portion of the population that is merely susceptible to manipulative rhetoric. The gullible masses are just that but in most cases although they mindlessly promote self serving narratives of sociopathic authoritarians they are not mentally disturbed themselves. We should thoughtfully engage with them rather than alienate. Quite a few seem to be waking up and paying attention as behavior of the authoritarians entrenching themselves in DC, and elsewhere, becomes ever more extreme.

Expand full comment

“Political Ponerology”tells the whole story. Brilliant book.

Expand full comment

Unfortunately there will always be a very small minority of sociopaths/psychopaths lusting for dictatorial control over everyone else. When those mentally ill control freaks have managed to seize tyrannical control history tells us of the horrors they inflict. And they don't leave peacefully, often fomenting enormously destructive wars before being removed from power. So yes, as history evidences those mentally disturbed monsters are a root of evil.

Expand full comment

“If you want to know who is in charge, simply look at who it is illegal to criticize”

Expand full comment

Authoritarians ALWAYS resort to censorship, which is one way to cut through all their nonsense self serving rhetoric and identify them for what they really are. The founders of our nation certainly understood as much, hence 1A.

Expand full comment

Sorry, but this isn’t always the case, and I can think of one group that is targeted.

Expand full comment

I was on the HUAC list in the 1960's. I had my phone tapped by the cops. It was incredibly stupid for the government (FBI under Hoover) to do this, as I was just an 18 year old kid with no true connection to politics or narcotics. I was just an anti-war hippie that hang around with some radical types and pot dealers. I didn't deal and I had no inside information about the radicals plans.

Expand full comment

exactly

Expand full comment

i have come to the conclusion that Evil rules humanity and for most of our history this is true and because it exists at the top of our societies pretending to be good, it continues to live on like a virus spreading its infectious disease and mutating and shape shifting. The key source is the monarchial structure of power - the King of Kings doctrine that builds empires, claims the right to rule, and wants to enslave humanity. Except for small windows of time we have suffered under this shit since Babylon

Expand full comment

All true. Those of us in the US with numerous decades under our belt were actually remarkably lucky, we lived in what may turn out to be the sweet spot in human history. That also means we understand what may be stolen from future generations by the self serving evil which is attempting to entrench in the US now.

Expand full comment

read it a while back, good explanation

Expand full comment

yes

Expand full comment

Part of the "divide and conquer" strategy is to promote the idea that, on the one hand, there are lots of "Marxists" running around controlling, or trying to control the world. And, on the other, rural white supremacists, misinformation spreaders, etc. In other words, as long as we are at each other's throats the divide and Conquer architects (whoever they are, we can guess) will win. Hitler's rallies were all about "Marxists," who of course were controlled by Jews. The Bolshevists/Marxist/Jews, and people were routinely waving signs at such rallies, you can see for yourself. The woke idiots aren't "Marxists" I don't think, because I know many of them and they aren't smart enough to have read Marx, in any case.

Expand full comment

Your personal views have no value expect to your sick mind.

Expand full comment

Nevertheless, we need a word for that opposition -- of the top, not the side. If it isn't Marxists, who is it? It *must* be identified.

"Marxists" works for me for two reasons:

(1) Rank and file Americans are small-d democrats, never Marxists. As with most normal people, they want peaceful lives, and have no interest in conquering anything. Like Rodney King, they "just want to get along."

(2) Marx's followers, if it's not Marx himself (hidden somewhere, maybe cryptically, in his work), have demonstrated a deep affinity for anti-democratic behavior, certainly from the time of the first national takeover in 1917 with the introduction of the vanguards. To your point, they are absolute geniuses at divide-and-conquer. The excuse always is the alleged intellectual immaturity of the rebellious hoi polloi lumpens. "Don't worry your pretty little heads over it, we'll give it back to you once you're all grown up!" Which of course didn't come in this original case even up to the point their clients had finally had enough in 1991, a record length of a human lifetime, 74 years. Funny how there wasn't a functional problem with the US since 1788, however imperfect a democracy.

My take on Marx is that he and Engels et al *never* had any interest in "the people". The Marxists wanted an ARMY, and they had a brilliant formula for getting it. What they were interested in was smashing the very idea of a fluid, functional society *integrating* the more capable with the less capable via the "original" concept of the Left (social responsibility or fairness, simplified as "equality"), which in the c.1789 case integrated not only the Right (individualist responsibility or freedom), but also Brotherhood (social identity). The last of these was chucked wholesale, and Left and Right was set at in unlimited, permanent, intra-national wars with each other. The rest is a sorry century and a half of history. *That's* your divide-and-conquer -- that is, of the minds, going well beyond the material.

The modern version, invented in the 50s, got rid of the squishy class-based divide-and-conquer, and replaced it with essentially immutable boundaries of race, sex, etc. The tell, though, was their complete abandonment of class, meaning they never actually gave a shit about "the people".

Expand full comment

That's a very convoluted and not-very-logical essay. "Funny how there wasn't a functional problem with the US since 1788, however imperfect a democracy." I am not sure what you mean by "functional problem." I guess it was okay to have child labor and death because of impossibly bad working conditions. Things were fine, it was the appearance of some Marxists I guess that ruined everything. It might interest to you to know that at the constitutional convention in Philadelphia there was grave concern about the threat of what they called, "democracy,": meaning, the mob could take over and threaten the interests of the rich bondholders who were running the American revolution. Try reading, "Founding Finance" by William Hogeland. Anyway, I digress. Marxism as an ideology and social movement is dead. You assert that "the rank and file" are not Marxists. Fine, then who are these mysterious hordes of Marxists who are running things? You think Albert Bourla is a Marxist? Tony Fauci? Klaus Schwab? Bill Gates? Valadimir Putin? All these people who locked down their populations and forced them to take the injection are Marxists? No. If you are looking for a word I offer you several: "globalists" "technocrats' "technofacsists" will do. The rank and file medical practitioners (doctors and nurses) , the Democratic and Republican politicians, whether state or federal office-holders are not "Marxists" but they are beholden to Big Pharma and others who are flush with cash. The climate-change, vaccinating, crisis-peddling politicians are not Marxists, but they are short-sighted tools of the technocrats and oligarchs.

Expand full comment

"That's a very convoluted and not-very-logical essay."

In some ways, yes. Was off the top of my head. My apologies. I'm still cleaning it up. My point remains that Marxism's a con -- *and* so are its shadow sympathizers, the Globalists. It's all of a piece.

"I am not sure what you mean by 'functional problem.' I guess it was okay to have child labor and death because of impossibly bad working conditions."

No, it isn't okay. The question is how the polity goes about fixing it. Will it be a disciplined and properly dedicated effort at diplomacy and a new integration of interests -- or will it be a new type of intra-national war, where only one "side" can win? Marx (or his followers) chose war. Globalists choose war. Neither chooses diplomacy with all the interested parties.

"there was grave concern about the threat of what they called, 'democracy,': meaning, the mob could take over and threaten the interests of the rich bondholders who were running the American revolution."

Exactly. Those were the (arguably legitimate, playing by existing rules) interests of a particular group. Meanwhile, there were obviously also in that convention, advocates *for* democracy, so in this case the interests of a clearly opposed group met them in a negotiation. And so, both were able to debate. My point there is that there was a general, silent, maybe even subconscious, agreement the general principle of allowing *all* groups permission (and power) to adequately participate in public discourse and in government. The devil, of course, is in the details of this implementation, but the principle of gov responsive to the will of the people is what matters here, vs Marxism.

"Fine, then who are these mysterious hordes of Marxists who are running things? You think Albert Bourla is a Marxist? Tony Fauci? Klaus Schwab? Bill Gates? Vladimir Putin?"

These people (to greater or lesser degree, and excluding Putin) represent a breakdown of a universal, public, cooperative system (liberal government), not its design. That is, corruption. A bunch of warlords mostly with their own agendas, sometimes cooperating with the globalist projects, but each running largely free in the decaying West.

"If you are looking for a word I offer you several: 'globalists' 'technocrats' 'technofacsists' will do."

Agreed, but that's not complete. I believe the globalists and Marxists' (New Leftists', to be precise) *leaders* cooperate, no matter what it looks like from the outside. Each wants the minds, and soon enough the bodies, of the "useless eaters" first to be useful if self-destructive armies, and then to rot away. (e.g. To take one example, do you think the half-century decay of inner-city Black society since Civil Rights era was an accident? How about the complete decay of US public education in that time, wherever implemented, urban, suburban, rural? You think this is just the work of these selfish warlords?) Thus, now, the mad rush of the globalists into AI, to further boggle and soon enough fully manage their minds.

To reiterate, rather than restore a system that, more or less, represents the will of the polity, they want to do away with it, and fill the peoples' brains with garbage until the people decay as much as their democracy has. People like, say, Edward Bernays and Walter Lippmann and HL Mencken provided the tone as to what they want. Their contempt for "the people" -- as if functional abilities determine moral rights -- is overwhelming. It dovetails with Marxism; whether the old-fashioned class version, the Chinese Cultural Revolution version, or the emergent Woke version, makes no difference, as a brainwashing mechanism to snooker them into destroying their minds and go along, and then their bodies when they are finally completely useless. Looks now to be rather soon...

Expand full comment

The bankers and British created Marxism to take down Russia and China and spread totalitarianism - the communist parties are simply a neo-monarchial structure with god removed - and who hated god and acted in ungodly and totalitarian ways - the western monarchies who gave themselves the right to rule under the Roman Catholic Church's Universal Monarchies doctrine, and their partners the Zionist bankers.

Everything that the Marxists have used are very old strategies that date back thousands of years and the western monarchies have been using them for all that time to conquer the world and spread their empires, while hiding behind their religions claiming to be on the side of god and righteousness. Bollocks. It was and is evil hiding in plain sight.

The communists are part of the global cabal. Which created them. The New World Order, which is as old as the Roman Empire, a term 1st used when Julius Caesar seized Rome.

Expand full comment

You are so right John. The Predator Class utilize the Media to ferment trouble between the Classes, Races, Political leanings, Religions etc. They cause the Hate for their own benefit and Psychotic urge to cause us pain which clearly they gain energy from.

Rarely do normal working Americans bring any of it up in daily conversations unless provoked by the Media.

Expand full comment

Operation Mockingbird six decades ongoing.....

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false" ~ William Casey, CIA Director (from first staff meeting 1981)

Expand full comment

These are the words of a traitor. A traitor was running the CIA. This shows that long before this time America had been taken over by traitors at the highest level, and just like David Rockefeller's comments in 1994 at the Press Club meeting, when he exposed himself as a traitor to America, working for a World Government, and having helped corrupt the media to their project, a billionaire confessing publicly and yet nothing happened to him. In an honest and just world both men would have been arrested, investigated and tried for treason.

Expand full comment

What the left gains by race baiting of whites is further chaos and destruction of our republic. By stirring up race hatred against all white people by blacks and brown-skinned people, they poison all relations and discourse, thereby destroying any trust between the groups.

Danny Huckabee

Expand full comment

But to what ends???

Expand full comment

Power for power's sake. A perpetually divided class of serfs allows the feudal lords to consolidate and maintain their power. The elite simply change the distraction towards which most will go running.

Expand full comment

Modern elites are a stateless class. They are unmoored from geography, history or culture. They view the nation state as an anachronism and obstruction to their plans. People with a clear conception of who they are as a people and a vision for their future are a obstacle to the exercise of power, which is the elites only value. They would rather rule over a global flavela than allow the unwashed any control over their own lives.

Expand full comment

They’re ( Marxists? or whatever you label them) goal is to destroy western civilization. They believe they gain control out of the chaos deliberately created by pitting us against one another. Breaking up or weakening the family unit is part of it as well. This is done by states passing legislation taking away parental rights & giving it over to state institutions like schools, doctors & counselors. Keeping parents in the dark while they do it. Also by corrupting & confusing our children with all the rainbow, lgbtq crap in schools, and incorporating perverted sex education in schools. My state legislature (WA) just passed legislation to include lgbtq curriculum in public schools. This when kids are failing math & can’t read. It’s the same anywhere the democrats are in charge. The party of death & destruction.

Expand full comment

I imagine you don't actually doubt the reasons behind the hyper focus on the race card. You're fishing:).

I hope you told your brother to stop listening to NPR. How can he stand their simpering, condescending tones? Full yuck factor.

Expand full comment

I confess, I used to for years, i liked their interviews etc. and I always try to hear the other side. But I can’t stomach them at all now. It’s just all nuts, none of them do any research, none of them portray another side. If they are young enough they could still have time to prepare for another career, but not much chance of that

Expand full comment

And why have they even become the other side? It's National PUBLIC Radio, after all. How do they explain it? For all their bellowing about democracy, they are intentionally anti-democratic.

Expand full comment

yes smugly so

Expand full comment

Yup! It would be interesting to try junior hi, and other ages, to see how they react to “Democratic” in their own life. Voting on a date for the prom? Voting on their school board? It is frightening to think that adding only ten years to a 15 year old, under the current Blah blah education system brings them up to their first voting choices and along with their total ignorance of how laws are made, if followed!! Terrifying! Haha….and marry some girlfriend who likewise has no clue about how their neighborhood and town is being run.~~~School boards aren’t crazy about parent protests which they have every right to do, and shut them down rather than allow them their podium time. Even anger, God bless those fighting moms and dads. Some interesting sights over these past several years, we just didn’t hear about them. ~~~Way-ell, we know now!!

Expand full comment

Ever since Obama rammed through in the 2012 NDAA the gutting of the Smith Mundt Act (which prohibited the government from directly planning and and executing a propaganda campaign against the American public- not that they didn’t try) NPR was taken over by the Voice of America type propagandists. Literally. Public radio and tv have NO dissidents any more.

It’s all now in the service to interests of the billionaire/trillionaire global oligarch governance which has co-opted every western government (at the very least). So yes listening to NPR is a totally different experience than say 30 years ago. Incidentally I found it quite tolerable when there were real marxists on the payroll there. Now it’s just neofeudalist handmaiden woke fools doing their part in the grand divide-and-conquer psyop.

Expand full comment

I agree we are going backwards. I never pay any attention to someone's race although I do pay attention to if I think they are trustworthy and capable. Race has nothing to do with it nor does gender in my world. To me it is simply an adjective to help recognize that person again. Are they short tall, fat thin, Straight hair curly hair or no hair, black white beige? Simply adjectives. Martin Luther King had it right by judging a person by their character. Why all these years later are we going backwards to gin up hate and division it seems. Very sad.

Expand full comment

What? A society based upon meritocracy? What a concept!

Expand full comment

If you go with the hypothesis that something is, in stealth mode, trying to conquer us, and has been for many decades, then many seemingly insane things make sense. Getting rid of phonics in education so few are literate and getting rid of recess and mandating liability- free vaxes, up to 90 now, and introducing social media (Jaron Lanier who worked in VR wrote a book about how the algorithms became secret around 2014), and introducing porn on phones, then pushing sexualized "social emotional learning" instead of literacy, numeracy (the stats from blue states on this are appalling), then get those kids and teachers to obsess over immutable characteristics, stop letting the highly intelligent and hardworking into college, or the unvaxxed, turn the schools and colleges into indoctrination, go after women (sports, prisons, women's spaces) and gay people and men and the family, transform therapy and psychology from treating trauma and helping people overcome adversity to be stronger into paying money to stay stuck as a victim or to pay to confess to your white privilege, shape people to not think for themselves but to follow "experts," disappear the history of communism and the twentieth century from education, disappear biology, civics. Then with the pandemic, purge all the institutions of the highly intelligent, those who think for themselves or who have excellent intuition or common sense, replace them with the indoctrinated. Pump "newcomers" as Biden calls them (so freaking sci-fi a term) through the border, spend tax dollars on them, or on "wars" (whatever those really are). We are being invaded and what James Lindsay calls "hatecraft" is being deployed everywhere, all the time, all at once. Replace our American landscape and calendar with woke idols and a corporate calendar of monthly celebrations punctuated by Black Friday, Prime Day, and faux pseudo corporate liberation movements, as was done in France during the Revolution and in Cambodia with Year Zero. Then turbo charge the hatecraft while releasing post-apocalyptic movies by Obama and films about civil war and then threaten people with closures of their bank accounts or firing if they make a social media post, or censor or shadow ban all the dissidents, so the quiet repression creates explosive feelings in people, hoping that violence will break out, so draconian measures can be instituted. etc etc etc They want us to believe we are either in a war against woke or a war against far right white supremacist gunloving bible thumping rednecks (Trump being literal Hitler) when we are actually being invaded and occupied and taken over by a force that is not exactly China or Iran or a Middle Eastern country, but this force wants us to sleepwalk into a China style social credit surveillance and a Middle Eastern style regimentation, particularly of women, perhaps bringing back harems, some filled with human trafficked kids. This month's theme is whiteness and Israel/Gaza, awhile back it was "what is a woman" Pay no attention to Goliath behind the curtain though.

Expand full comment

I asked a black man recently did he experience racism and he said yes. A black neighbor, educated, successful told me in no uncertain terms, his skin color had an impact in his life. I believe them. That doesn't mean I believe in the 'equity' ideology as an antidote.

Expand full comment

If the 'equity' ideology keeps being pushed, I fear it will awaken racism as a major force due to a backlash against that ideology, Many unthinking people will blame all black people for the sins of a few elites, mostly Ivy League whites who are pushing that crap.

Expand full comment

I agree. The ideology which is 'supposed' to be inclusive is actually divisive.

Expand full comment

The grift was running out of steam. This is just an attempt to keep the grift going. "There is another class of coloured people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs — partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs." ~ Booker T. Washington

Expand full comment

…the non-Reverend Al Sharpton comes to mind.

Expand full comment

Race-hustler extraordinaire.

Expand full comment

👍

Expand full comment

Ridiculous is the term that comes to mind. The rhetoric is beyond! After all, my white family of 6, mother, father, grandmother, uncle, myself and my brother slept in a one room house till I was 6. I never felt privileged and I never felt less than, I felt loved. I was not taught that I lacked anything or was owed anything. I was taught to treat people with respect, to treat people like you want to be treated. I did not bring black people to America, and I totally disagree with how human beings were treated in that time and age. But, America has tried and tried to turn the corner and to no avail. The truth, which is people who are robbing and stealing in the streets should be arrested and feel the consequence of their behaviors doesn't seem important. The truth that every man should be judged by the action they take, today, does not seem important. The truth that a man should not be judged by the color of his skin but instead by the content of his character does not seem important. I personally will always hold President Obama personally responsible for the turning of the tide for change, to a very negative place. He had such an opportunity to make change for the good of the country, but, perhaps due to his social agenda, he could not focus on anything other than showing white Amercans how much they could be hated and how badly they could be mistreated. The suffering of others will always be wrong if brought about at the hands of another, no matter what the color of their skin is, that is the truth!

Expand full comment

It started way before Obummer.

"I've made it my life's mission to destroy the United States. I hate this country and I hate all of the people in it!" ~ George Soros - Newsweek 1979

"I'm going to bring down the United States by funding Black hate groups. We'll put them into a mental trap and make them blame white people. The Black community is the easiest to manipulate." ~ George Soros - interview with Germany's BILD newspaper, Sept. 2014

Expand full comment

Terrible and sad it does not get coverage by the media. America has always been a great nation and to be brought down by the stupidity of its own people not being able to recognize the truth , speak the truth and know how to correct the current climate is a sad historic moment!

Expand full comment

Operation Mockingbird six decades ongoing.....

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media" ~ Director William Colby

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false" ~ William Casey, CIA Director (from first staff meeting 1981)

The deeper question arises: who REALLY owns and controls the CIA?? And why did JFK promise to "splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the wind" ?

Expand full comment

When the whole unsavory operations of the 3 letter agencies were spun off to NGOs with Orwellian names in the 1980s that opened the door to psychopathic billionaires to directly steer these organizations like the NED and USAID with American tax dollars to seed their ops around the world. A public/private/deep state hybrid in each one of these organizations. Monstrous.

Expand full comment

The dude from Kenya had a White mother.

Expand full comment

Who was a c y ā asset

Expand full comment

Your clarification is a reminder of the evil of government.

Expand full comment

I'm something like a 12th cousin to him on his white mother's side. Our mutual ancestors in those lines were British aristocrats and descendants of many royal houses. So Obama probably enjoys 'white privilege.' He's rich and connected, so he enjoys more of it than me. I ain't rich.

Expand full comment

Very sweet and pithy

Expand full comment

Everything today has to do with separation of people. If we are busy hating China, Russia, black people, white people, Republicans or Democrats we are not paying attention to the power mongers behind all of this. This is how they consolidate their power. The sooner we all realize that we are all just people the sooner we will break their power over us.

Expand full comment

Just want to say, so true. We need to recognize that and accept people for who they are even if they do not think like us.

Expand full comment

And only then can we achieve true greatness as a species. Strip us all naked and it is obviously apparent that we are all the same with the obvious differences between the sexes. This attack on our cosmetic differences is their only weapon against us. They are quite accomplished and using these petty differences against us.

Expand full comment

Responding to...Why do people at places like NPR wish to perpetuate racial classifications of humanity? I believe Thomas Sowell summed it up well. "Racism is not dead, but it's on life support -- keep alive by politicians, race hustlers & people who get a sense of superiority by denouncing others as racists."

Expand full comment

divide and conquer. We have to learn to ignore most mainstream news outlets.

Expand full comment

Ignoring one of the primary sources of cancer within the public mind is what got us here

(Marxist-infiltration of academia is the other).

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men (and women) to do nothing" ~ Edmund Burke

Expand full comment

"Of all forms of slavery there is none that is so harmful and degrading as that form of slavery which tempts one human being to hate another by reason of his race or color. One man cannot hold another man down in the ditch without remaining down in the ditch with him." ~ Booker T. Washington

Expand full comment

Groups are easier to manage and divide than individuals

Expand full comment

There is an agenda to genocide the white race. Duh.

Expand full comment

I think you may be mistaken. The real agenda is to genocide most of humanity to feed the elitist dream of having it all to themselves. They don't care what colour we are. They just want us all dead and gone with the exception of enough left to serve them.

Expand full comment

White, Christian societies of moral clarity/fortitude and spiritual integrity are the biggest roadblock to global governance, hence why the wide-scale attack on all such populations increased dramatically in the last 20 years. It's their endgame.

Expand full comment

This is how google’s Ai Gemini answered the question:

Why is there a widespread attack on white Christian societies of moral clarity/fortitude and spiritual integrity in America?

“The perception of a widespread attack on white Christian societies in America is a complex and sensitive topic. Here's a breakdown of some factors to consider:

Cultural Shifts:

America is becoming increasingly diverse, with growing populations of minority religions and ethnicities. This shift can challenge traditional cultural norms, sometimes perceived as an attack.

Secularization:

There's a trend towards secularism in the US, with a decline in the dominance of religion in public life. This can be seen as a threat to the values of some Christian groups.

Political Discourse:

Political debates often touch on cultural issues, with strong opinions on both sides. This can lead to feelings of being under attack, even if not directly targeted.

Social Media:

Social media can amplify extreme viewpoints and create a sense of conflict that may not reflect reality.

It's important to note that these are just some general points, and the specific reasons why people feel this way can vary.

Here are some alternative perspectives to consider:

Religious Tolerance: America has a long history of religious freedom, and diversity of beliefs is considered a strength.

Focus on Values: Many people believe in core moral values like honesty and kindness, regardless of religion.

Open Dialogue: Open and respectful discussion can help bridge divides and promote understanding.

If you're interested in learning more about this topic, here are some suggestions for further research:

Look for reputable news sources that cover cultural and religious issues in a balanced way.

Read books or articles by authors from a variety of religious and cultural backgrounds.

Consider talking to people with different beliefs to get their perspectives.

Remember, fostering understanding and respectful dialogue is important in today's diverse society.”

Of course, as a warning, Gemini Ai has been proven to be bias itself because of those who are programming the system. It has even been known to provide fake answers and make up fake quotes and articles claiming that respectable writers like Matt Taibbi actually wrote them.

Expand full comment

Relying on a computer program to address the issue of globalist takedown of western and/or Christian civilization? Sure. You're already caught in The Matrix.

Expand full comment

Hawks ~ Thanks for commenting. The purpose for posting the Ai product was addressed in my last paragraph. I will admit to being a curious truth seeker and a devoted follower of Jesus Christ who provides me discernment in all things big and small.

It’s important that we each test out everything to see if it produces good or bad fruit. Gemini, like ChatGPT and other Ai products are only as useful as the seeds of information that are programmed into them.

Much like you and Matt, I’ve concluded that none of what is programmed within their algorithms is good or fruitful for humanities sake and for the advancement of the biblical truths laid bare thousands of years ago for all to read and comprehend. It is within the chapters of the Good Book alone where we will and can find all truths that matter to us individually and as a people. The Bible tells us:

“Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.“

‭‭Matthew‬ ‭7‬:‭15‬-‭20‬ ‭NIV‬‬

Expand full comment

Only because our whole society is built on Christian principles. These are the keystones of our society and they must be dismantled before they can succeed.

Expand full comment

It is an age-old Power Struggle between God and Satan.

Expand full comment

Perhaps you should broaden your research. Look into the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan (for Europe).

Research things written and said by Noel Ignatiev and Barbara Lerner Spectre.

If you think that these two authors are the ONLY ones saying/writing such things, please look into the books by: Metzl, Kimmel, Applebaum, Wise, Isenberg, Eshleman, Lipstiz, Frankenberg, Katz, Kaufman, Hagerman, and Rothenberg (just to name a few)

There is a barrage of this type of rhetoric meant to demean white peoples (to the point that many are championing their own demise). There is a mass of "other colors" being illegally ushered in on my and YOUR dime, meant to replace you and I (assuming you are white).

\YES. This is a very real, orchestrated attempt to genocide white people. Disbelieve at your own risk.

Here is 5:31 of video content I made that makes it all plain by naming names:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/6fQLNTKNkn81/

Expand full comment

Of course we are at the top of the list. We are the ones who have had a taste of freedom when we were young. We must be eliminated first so our ideas don't "poison" the new ones coming into the country. They are temporarily useful to gain control. Once we are eliminated the real exterminations of all populations can begin with a lot less resistance.

Expand full comment

Explain non-white population explosive growth in Africa and most other countries.

Expand full comment

As long as they can be exploited with little cost to the elite they will be used to achieve their first objective which is destroying people of European descent. Not because of our colour but because we are the most literate and therefore more capable of understanding what is going on. The carrot for these poor souls is having what we have. Unfortunately, When they have been used to eliminate Western Christian Society they too will be eliminated.

Expand full comment

You misunderstood. Why aren't they killing others in their lands? Why aren't they forcing whitey into Africa?

Because the agenda is anti-white, not anti-others.

Expand full comment

.

Liberal Urban Whites

Are Terrified Of Urban Blacks.

The Urbane Liberals

Need To Portray Themselves

As “In The Good Fight”

[ Insert Anyone But Themselves ]

Lest The Blacks Get Wise

To What The Liberal Urban Whites

Have Actually Done To Them.

.

Expand full comment

The educated upper middle class liberal white female sort of fits this description. They are the scourge of society right now, because they are the ones perpetuating all this woke idealism and bullshit. And I happen to know some people like this. They used to be my friends. Several years ago I got rid of them because I couldn’t stand the stupidity, all they wanna do is virtue signal how open-minded and accepting and liberal they are. Like that’s really some kind of crown to be worn with pride. Give me a break But when it comes down to it, they don’t ever act on anything. They’re just full of hot air and stupidity.

Expand full comment

The racialists see the world and the economy as a zero-sum game. If you have something then logically they can’t have it. If you are white, then you only have it because whiteness conferred it on you by privilege. If you think you worked for it that’s only because whiteness allowed you to get that job. In this reasoning, minorities are unable to rise in the world because white people got there first, or took it away, and there is nothing for minorities unless white people get out of the way and give it up. And they should because justice. It’s not their fault so don’t talk about single parents or drug culture or lack of respect for education. Just shut up, feel guilty, and give it all up.

Expand full comment

🎯 🎯🎯

Expand full comment

What is to be gained? More bird seed! If white people stop mowing lawns like a bunch of racists, the grass will grow, seed heads will form, and boom, more bird seed. And that benefits bird watchers too! But wait, NPR says bird watching is also racist, so actually, nothing is gained: https://www.npr.org/2021/06/05/1002944505/monuments-and-teams-have-changed-names-as-america-reckons-with-racism-birds-are-

Expand full comment