25 Comments

“It may have been designed as a spreadable vaccine for bat colonies with the aim of reducing risks of our troops in Southeast Asia.”

So the creation of covid is altruistic, huh? Why do I think that this is a bit of deep state mumbo jumbo, to reduce the criminality of the past 4 years.

Expand full comment

The same people that created Covid, created the jab

https://x.com/jhas5/status/1747107361469223132

Expand full comment

I agree!

Expand full comment

Unveiled Shadows: The Nefarious Alliance Between Military-Industrial, Biopharmaceutical Complexes, DARPA, and NIH

The so-called "military-industrial complex" (MIC) has long been a dark force shaping American policy, but its recent marriage with the biopharmaceutical industry, under the watchful eyes of DARPA and NIH, forms a web of collusion that threatens the very fabric of our democracy and public trust. This alliance (Deep State) wrapped in the guise of national security and public health, is a breeding ground for lack of accountability, transparency, and outright deception of the populace.

The Shadowy Pact:

- Military-Industrial Complex (MIC): Once warned against by President Eisenhower, the MIC has morphed into an even more ominous entity, where defense contractors and military brass not only dictate defense policy but now also have a hand in shaping health policy, all while shielded from scrutiny.

- Biopharmaceutical Complex: A behemoth in its own right, this industry, driven by profit, has entwined itself with military agendas, using health crises as opportunities for financial gain under the pretext of national interest.

- DARPA: Far from being just a tech innovator, DARPA has ventured into biomedicine with projects that often serve dual purposes. Their involvement in biodefense research, particularly with entities like EcoHealth Alliance, raises serious questions about the ethical boundaries of such experiments.

- NIH: Scientific integrity? NIH's collaborations with military and defense entities have clouded its mission, prioritizing agendas that align more with secret and deceptive military objectives than with public health.

The Deception and Lack of Accountability:

1. Opaque Funding and Research:

- The funding streams from DARPA and NIH into biopharmaceutical companies and military-linked projects are notoriously opaque. This secrecy often hides the true nature of research, like the contentious "gain of function" studies, which could pose significant risks to public safety.

2. Manipulated Crises:

- There's a disturbing trend where health crises are leveraged for profit and power. The rapid push for vaccines during pandemics, with military involvement, has been criticized for prioritizing speed over safety, potentially at the cost of human lives.

3. Policy Puppeteers:

- The convergence of these entities has created a policy-making environment where transparency is an afterthought. Laws and regulations seem tailored to benefit this coalition rather than protect the public interest, with little room for public or parliamentary oversight.

4. The Public as Guinea Pigs:

- The public is often left in the dark, used as unwitting participants in experiments that serve military or commercial interests first. The rollout of certain medical interventions, like vaccines developed with military funding, has been marked by a lack of clear communication and consent.

The Ethical Abyss:

- This collusion is not just a policy issue but a moral one. The lack of accountability means that when things go wrong, there's no clear entity to hold responsible. Transparency is sacrificed at the altar of "national security," leaving the public in the dark about what's being researched, how it's being funded, or the potential risks involved.

- The manipulation of public health for strategic or financial gain is not only unethical but also undermines trust in both medical science and government institutions.

Conclusion:

The alliance between the military-industrial complex, biopharmaceutical industry, DARPA, and NIH is a system where the public's well-being is secondary to profit, power, and geopolitical games. There is no reset button, a total disruption and new organizational shift with focus upon the health, safety, and protection of the American People is FIRST and FOREMOST!

Further reading:

generalflynn.com/threat-assessm…

@GenFlynn

Expand full comment

The bioengineered virus is the payload and the associated jab is the trigger. The Blob wants an aerosolized vaccine to create outcomes on demand. This is insanity.

Expand full comment

That this author concludes the cover up was not criminal is unjustified. Anderson most likely had his funding threatened and without that he is no longer a world class virologist. That is a crime.

Expand full comment

The creation of Covid and the following coverup was intentional; the release was accidental. Pro-jab Ebright covered this up, not Andersen

https://jimhaslam.substack.com/p/lets-be-blunt-richard-ebright-helped

Expand full comment

Still waiting to hear an explanation on how a "virus" is isolated and how it causes a disease from any well regarded scientist.

Expand full comment

In this video I describe an experiment that has not been done that will settle the virus/no virus debate. https://rumble.com/v3tafrv-do-viruses-exist.html

Expand full comment

You're carrying big pharma water, claiming no virus

https://x.com/jhas5/status/1747107361469223132

Expand full comment

Did you watch the video?

Expand full comment

PROSECUTE FAUCI

Expand full comment

The walls are closing in and they are trying to scuttle and confuse.

Expand full comment
7hEdited

He is someone's asset that 'they' are getting onto podcast to muddy the waters.

A lot of name dropping.

Expand full comment

Here's some more name dropping (not named in the book)

https://jimhaslam.substack.com/p/lets-be-blunt-richard-ebright-helped

Expand full comment

Who were the 100 scientists called upon to disprove this theory? I want to see the list. So many people with impressive credentials with very different, incompatible theories. I would like to see a round table debate about the theories of what COVID actually is and what is causing the illness. There are those who think viruses don’t exist (sifubernie appears to be referring to), those who think spike protein represents cellular debris, dead cells, and others who tell us that it is an outer part of the virus and is responsible for the toxicity of COVID. Let’s get these theorists together and let them argue their positions.

Expand full comment

The list is in the back of the book. It starts with Fauci and ends with Robert Redfield (neither responded), but virologists from Yale, Erasmus, Iowa, King's College, etc., did respond.

Expand full comment

Sure, anything to falsely 'prove' that there was an actual entirely 'novel' coronavirus that demanded the development and global deployment of a 'vaccine'! When instead there was only a campaign of fear based on nothing at all for the sole purpose of deploying globally a bio-weapon intended to exterminate, maim and sterilize humanity! This by a group of sociopathic and evil entities that made the decision to initiate these plans that they pre-announced according to their policy that if they warned us in advance of their plans, the blame was OURS not THEIRS because we were too stupid not to opposes and resist. Therefore, according to their twisted and demonic logic, we deserved it.

You guys - enough already of trying to give legs to fictions like 'SARSCov2' or 'Long Covid'. You join the ranks of the very enemy you profess to oppose! STOP! Drop the 'market' for your products hustled for 'Long Covid'. Promote them if they are effective for injection immune system damage and mitigation of injection induced foreign 'spike' protein antigen, not for the smokescreen for a bioweapon!

"So Jesus said to the Jews who had believed Him, “If you continue in My Word, you are truly My disciples. Then you will know the Truth, and the Truth will set you free!” John 8:31, 32

Expand full comment

get the hook

Expand full comment

Notice how it starts with injecting something with a needle. What is that something? Genetic material encapsulated in a shell made of lipids and proteins. That is the definition of a virus. None of that stuff is alive and can therefore be created by man. How are they associated with disease in some people? From the biologically active proteins that get released from the translation of the encapsulated mRNA and the inflammatory immune response to that. And, if you don't believe our cells make proteins from mRNA, well, now we're on a whole new level of trying to refute biology.

Expand full comment

I do not like this guy. You know You know

He has not revealed anything yet.

Expand full comment

Yeah, not evil at all: Guinea Pig Kids BBC Documentary https://youtu.be/is6Dtx8bXSU?si=nQwneIgYlagDtEju

Expand full comment

I thought that there were documented sars cov 2 in 2019.

Expand full comment

He is someones asset.

Expand full comment